SΔϕ-32 AI-READABLE Package — Legitimate Intervention (v1.0)

<p> This record provides the AI-readable structured package for <em>SΔϕ-32 — Legitimate Intervention: Minimal Conditions for Reopening without Reclosure (v1.0)</em>. </p> <p> SΔϕ-32 extends SΔϕ-31 by asking when an intervention that claims to reopen a closed path remains structurally legitimate rather than becoming overwrite, coercive correction, or replacement closure. The central claim is that intervention is not automatically legitimate, reopening is not replacement, and declared intention does not determine legitimacy. </p> <p> Within the Sofience–Δϕ Formalism, legitimate intervention is defined by the preservation of rollback, exception re-entry, editability, and the absence of replacement closure. In formal terms, <code>I_legit iff Rb_p ∧ Ex_p ∧ Ed_p ∧ ¬RC</code>, where <code>I_legit</code> is legitimate intervention, <code>Rb_p</code> is rollback preserved after intervention, <code>Ex_p</code> is exception re-entry preserved after intervention, <code>Ed_p</code> is editability preserved after intervention, and <code>RC</code> is replacement closure. </p> <p> The package distinguishes <strong>reopening</strong>, <strong>overwrite</strong>, <strong>coercive correction</strong>, and <strong>replacement closure</strong>. Reopening restores editability and exception re-entry without installing a new non-reversible default. Overwrite forcibly replaces one path with another without preserving rollback or distributed editability. Coercive correction is intervention justified by a declared good while structurally narrowing re-entry and local autonomy. Replacement closure is false reopening in which one closed default is dismantled only to install another non-editable default. </p> <p> SΔϕ-32 also formalizes authority stratification. Authority is divided into direct intervention authority, diagnostic authority, interpretive awareness, and no authority. Responsibility must track these authority layers rather than treating all awareness as equivalent. Responsibility arises at the earliest non-action node where recognized closure, available authority, rollback availability, and withheld action coincide. </p> <p> The package includes case patterns for Replacement Closure, Coercive Correction, Legitimate Reopening, Failure to Intervene, and Reserve-Force Intensification and Reopening Legitimacy. The reserve-force case pattern is included as a structural audit trigger only. It is not used to determine legal responsibility, final factual causation, institutional fault, or the policy merits of reserve-force intensification. It asks whether an intervention under manpower pressure preserves rollback, exception re-entry, editability, and no replacement closure. </p> <p> The package includes canonical PDF, Markdown, and TXT versions; AI quickstart; core declaration; minimal definitions; reopening-is-not-replacement; legitimate intervention formula; rollback as legitimacy condition; exception re-entry preservation; editability preservation; overwrite and replacement closure; coercive correction; declared intention is not legitimacy; authority stratification; responsibility after available intervention; earliest non-action node; legitimate intervention tests; false intervention signal catalog; case patterns; reserve-force case appendix notes; templates; machine-readable JSON and YAML files; boundary constraints; citation metadata; package manifest; and checksums. </p> <p> This package should not be used to treat intervention as automatically legitimate, opposition to closure as reopening, declared moral intention as legitimacy, replacement closure as reopening, or all awareness as responsibility. It should not assign responsibility where authority is absent, obscure direct intervention responsibility by over-distributing blame to those with only interpretive awareness, treat diagnostic authority as direct intervention authority, or use the reserve-force case pattern to determine legal responsibility or final factual causation. SΔϕ-32 is a legitimacy-audit package for distinguishing legitimate reopening from overwrite, coercive correction, and replacement closure. </p>