Datasets for access and benefit sharing of genetic resources bibliometrics analyses

These are the datasets from two searches of the ABS literature on Scopus. First we did a broad search on 3 September 2019 using the terms “access and benefit sharing” AND “convention on biological diversity” in all fields for all articles, book chapters, reviews, books and conference papers for all years. This capture all possible instances of the search terms in the literature, but it also included publications where the terms were not central to the publication and indeed may only have appeared in the reference lists/bibliographies. The hypothesis was that this strategy would identify the broadest scope of ABS literature including research in peripheral areas. We then repeated the search, again on 3 September 2019, but this time limited it to the publications that used the terms in titles, abstracts and/or keywords, and again for all years. The hypothesis was that publications focusing on ABS and CBD were more likely to prioritize the use of the terms in the titles, abstracts and/or keywords, but we recognise in doing so we may have excluded some relevant publications from this subset of publications from the broader search.

本数据集源自斯高帕斯（Scopus）数据库中针对遗传资源获取与惠益分享（Access and Benefit Sharing，简称ABS）相关文献开展的两次检索。首次检索于2019年9月3日完成，检索式为“access and benefit sharing” AND “convention on biological diversity”，检索范围覆盖全字段，文献类型涵盖所有年份的期刊论文、图书章节、综述、专著及会议论文。该检索策略可捕获文献中所有匹配检索词的条目，但同时也会纳入检索词并非核心内容、甚至仅出现在参考文献列表或书目中的文献。本次检索的预设假设为：该方案可覆盖最广泛的ABS相关文献，包括边缘领域的研究。随后于2019年9月3日重复开展检索，但本次将检索范围限定为检索词出现在标题、摘要和/或关键词中的文献，同样覆盖所有年份。本次检索的预设假设为：聚焦ABS与生物多样性公约（Convention on Biological Diversity，简称CBD）的文献，更倾向于在标题、摘要和/或关键词中优先使用相关术语，但我们也意识到，该策略可能会从首次广谱检索所得文献的子集中排除部分相关文献。