A Single-Case Cognitive Architecture: Cross-Validation Across Six Theoretical Frameworks

This archive contains the complete public release of a Structural Observation Reverse-Mapping (SORM) report series analyzing a single cognitive subject's architecture through six independent academic frameworks: OODA Loop (Boyd), SRK Framework (Rasmussen), Situation Awareness Model (Endsley), Game Theory (Harsanyi/Nash), Complex Adaptive Systems (Holland/Kauffman), and Cybernetics (Wiener/Ashby/Bateson). Methodology: SORM reverses the conventional academic sequence (hypothesis → framework → subject → conclusion). Instead, directly observed cognitive structures serve as the starting point, which are then reverse-mapped onto established theoretical frameworks. Cross-framework convergence serves as the primary validation mechanism. This is an observational documentation methodology, not hypothesis-driven research. Contents (21 files): CAUTION Preface (access & ethics notice) Master Cover & Table of Contents All PDF documents are provided individually (000–019). Source Word documents (.docx) are bundled in a single ZIP archive (020). Scope & Limitations: This is an N=1 case study. The SORM methodology is designed for structural documentation of observed cognitive patterns, not for generalization across populations. Speculative extensions are explicitly graded (Grade B) and distinguished from empirically anchored analysis (Grade A). The research subject is also the primary researcher; epistemological implications of this dual role are addressed in the methodology statement. Ethics & Anonymization: All third-party identifiers have been removed or anonymized. Confidential supplementary materials (Section 7-2, Appendix G-2) are withheld from public release and maintained under separate access control. Primary data sources (Contact Log) are referenced but not included. Documentation Tools: An LLM was used as a documentation and translation assistant. All core observations, analytical judgments, and conclusions originate from the research subject. The LLM's role is explicitly disclosed in the methodology statement. Feedback Welcome: As an LLM was used as a documentation tool, there may be errors the researcher has not yet identified. Corrections, structural critiques, counter-evidence, and questions are all welcome. The researcher may be slow to respond but will engage with substantive feedback. SORM Framework | system0.2.1[0,0,0] :: Y(λsophia.sophia) | Open Access — Citation and application require author authorization.