five

Heparin-coated vs. Non-coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits: Comparing Immediate Results with Different Target Activated Clotting Time

收藏
DataCite Commons2021-03-25 更新2024-07-28 收录
下载链接:
https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Heparin-coated_vs_Non-coated_Cardiopulmonary_Bypass_Circuits_Comparing_Immediate_Results_with_Different_Target_Activated_Clotting_Time/14281825/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Abstract Objective: To compare immediate postoperative results in patients receiving heparin-albumin-coated and non-coated circuits. Methods: A total of 241 patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery were divided into two groups: those receiving heparin-coated circuits (Bioline®, Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG., Hirrlingen, Germany) and those receiving non-coated circuits (Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG., Hirrlingen, Germany). Results: Activated clotting times (ACT) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were significantly shorter in the heparin-albumin-coated group than in the non-coated group (355.64±34.12 vs. 560.38±90.20, respectively, P=0.001). In-hospital mortality and postoperative stroke rates and lengths of intensive care unit stay were similar between the groups; in contrast, in the heparin-albumin-coated group, patients had significantly better outcomes for hospital stay, drainage, and need for erythrocyte transfusion. Conclusion: Heparin-coated circuits and reduced level of systemic heparinization with 300 seconds of target ACT level in cardiac surgery under CPB are safe and result in a very satisfactory clinical course.
提供机构:
SciELO journals
创建时间:
2021-03-24
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务