Data from: A before-and-after assessment of patch-burn grazing and riparian fencing along headwater streams

1. Fire and grazing are common in grasslands worldwide to maintain grass cover and cattle production. The effects of fire, cattle grazing, and riparian fencing efficacy on prairie stream ecology are not well characterized at catchment scales. 2. We examined alterations to stream water quality and biology from patch-burn grazing in tallgrass prairie during a five-year, replicated, catchment scale experiment that used a Before–After Control–Impact (BACI) design and was analysed by mixed-effects models. Treatments included two patch-burned control catchments (fire but no grazers) and patch-burn grazing in two riparian fenced and two unfenced catchments. We assessed the effectiveness of riparian fencing for mitigating potential water quality impacts by monitoring water quality and use of riparian by cattle via Global Positioning System. 3. Riparian fences effectively excluded cattle, while in unfenced pastures cattle aggregated along streams 10–20% of the grazing season. 4. After initiation of patch-burn grazing, we detected large increases in some nutrients, Escherichia coli, algal biomass, primary productivity, and community respiration in all catchments with patch-burn grazing. Some water quality variables, such as E. coli concentrations, recovered quickly which indicated resiliency. 5. Riparian fencing moderately reduced the impacts to stream variables, indicating either overland flow or subsurface flow allowed nutrients and bacteria to enter the streams. 6. Synthesis and applications. Patch-burn grazing is a measurable disturbance that can alter the ecological condition of streams. Riparian fencing lessened the degree of impact, yet some water quality variables still exceeded regional reference conditions. Managers will need to assess the costs of riparian fencing compared to the moderate benefits that fencing provides to water quality.1. 全球范围内，火烧与放牧是维持草地覆盖、保障肉牛生产的常见管理手段。但目前在集水区尺度上，火烧、肉牛放牧以及河岸围栏效能对草原溪流生态的影响，尚未得到充分表征。 2. 本研究依托一项为期5年、设置重复的集水区尺度实验，针对高草草原的斑块火烧放牧行为对溪流水质与生物群落的影响展开调查。该实验采用前后对照影响（Before–After Control–Impact, BACI）设计，并通过混合效应模型进行数据分析。实验处理组包括2个仅实施火烧但无放牧的对照集水区，以及2个设置河岸围栏、2个未设置河岸围栏的斑块火烧放牧集水区。研究通过监测水质，以及借助全球定位系统（Global Positioning System）追踪肉牛对河岸带的利用情况，评估河岸围栏缓解潜在水质影响的效能。 3. 河岸围栏可有效阻挡肉牛进入，而在未设置围栏的牧场中，肉牛在放牧季内会有10%~20%的时间聚集在溪流沿岸。 4. 斑块火烧放牧实施后，所有实施该管理方式的集水区内，部分营养盐、大肠杆菌（Escherichia coli）浓度、藻类生物量、初级生产力以及群落呼吸水平均出现显著上升。部分水质指标（如大肠杆菌浓度）可快速恢复，这体现了溪流生态系统的恢复力。 5. 河岸围栏可适度降低溪流生态指标受到的干扰，这表明营养盐与细菌可通过地表径流或地下径流进入溪流。 6. 研究综合与应用：斑块火烧放牧属于可量化的干扰行为，会改变溪流的生态状态。河岸围栏可降低此类干扰的程度，但部分水质指标仍超出区域参照标准。管理者需结合河岸围栏的建设成本，权衡其对水质改善带来的适度效益。