TABLE 2 in A review and analysis of names and designations published in Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae) (when, where, by whom, and from where did the material originate) between 1801 and 1908, when the final part of Raymond-Hamet's two-part monograph was published

TABLE 2. Analysis of names, combinations, and designations published in Kalanchoe from 1800 [1801] to 1908. The cut-off date is January 1908, when the second part of Hamet’s two-part monograph appeared in print [but see the main text for a note on the names K. pyramidalis Schönland (1907: 154) and K. latisepala Brown (1908: 435)]. Illegitimate names are included in the numbers in the 3 rd column. Names of unresolved application are regarded as “accepted” in the 4 th column. # [row in column 1 in Table 1]DecadeNumber of names and combinations published in Kalanchoe [designations]Number of currently accepted Kalanchoe names published in the decadePredominant geographical origin, if any, of the material described in Kalanchoe1. [A.]1800–181075Various, across the natural range of the genus2. [B.]1811–182021Africa and India3. [C.]1821–18304 [1]2Various, across the natural range of the genus4. [D.]1831–18405 [7]2India5. [E.]1841–185074Africa and Arabian Peninsula6. [F.]1851–186053Madagascar and India7. [G.]1861–187094Africa8. [H.]1871–188012 [2]7Africa9. [I.]1881–18903220Madagascar10. [J.]1891–190025 [1]7Africa11. [K.]1901–1908*33 [2]16Africa and Madagascar-Total:141 [13] [=154]71Various, across the natural range of the genus *January 1908.