Comparison of data from the current study with data from four previous studies that examined the phenotypes of human and rabbit MSCs.
收藏Figshare2015-12-02 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Comparison_of_data_from_the_current_study_with_data_from_four_previous_studies_that_examined_the_phenotypes_of_human_and_rabbit_MSCs_/1232397
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
The studies of Pittenger et al. and Lapi et al. did not specify how MSCs were defined as positive or negative for a given marker. Only Dominici's study strictly defined the positive or negative reactivity of MSCs for a given marker according to the percentage of marker-labeled cells§; however, only a small number of markers was studied. The study by Martínez-Lorenzo et al. reported the percentage of MSCs that were labeled with a marker; however, many of their results did not fulfill Dominici's criteria§.§Dominici's criteria: a cell sample is positive for a given marker if more than 95% of cells express the marker, whereas it is negative if less than 2% of cells express the marker [1].*: ≥95% of cells labeled by the marker (+), ≤2% of cells labeled by the marker (-).Comparison of data from the current study with data from four previous studies that examined the phenotypes of human and rabbit MSCs.
创建时间:
2015-12-02



