Global patterns of biocultural approaches to pollinators and pollination

Global patterns of the contribution of biocultural approaches to pollinators and pollination to quality of life, from studies/sites identified in an analysis. These data were collected as part of, and in addition to, a contribution to the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services assessment of Pollinators and Pollination in Food Production. The data show locations of sites where Indigenous and Local Knowledge (ILK) contributes to: (a) beekeeping; (b) honey hunting; (c) Intangible Cultural Heritage listed as globally significant; (d) Cultural and mixed (cultural/natural) sites inscribed on the World Heritage List (WHL) with significance to pollinators. Also includes studies/sites identified where ILK contributions to practices that protect pollinators: Actions to foster pollinator nesting resources; mental maps of pollinators/resources; totems; taboos; manipulation of resources in the landscape; use of biotemporal indicators; and fire to stimulate pollination resources. Shows the locations of three types of diversified farming systems where ILK has been shown to contribute to pollinator conservation: shifting agriculture; home gardens; and commodity agroforestry. Globally Significant Agricultural Heritage Sites that contribute to pollinators and pollination are also included. This record includes the data underpinning maps that have been published in Nature Sustainability with full public access deposit. These maps did not appear in the IPBES assessment.\nLineage: An initial review of scientific literature was conducted using a systematic protocol (searching English, Spanish and French literature) with four subsequent steps to enable incorporation and analysis of ILK10. First, a global call was issued for indigenous and local knowledge holders and experts who wished to contribute information relevant to pollinators and pollination, to participate in global and community dialogues. The resultant global and community dialogues provided much-needed information and guidance, and were supplemented by an ILK scoping literature review11. Second, an analytical framework was co-developed between ILK-holders and experts to guide the project. Third, literature was prioritised where evidence showed a direct role for ILK holders in representing and validating their own knowledge. Fourth, spatial analysis undertaken to locating the various national and regional data syntheses and site-specific examples in relation to the themes in the analytical framework. The final steps to enable this analysis involved firstly updating the review with publications since 2015 (the cut-off date for the IPBES pollination report), and heritage sites and elements listed in 2016-17; and secondly re-analysing the data gathered through the dialogues11 and literature to respond to all elements of the IPBES CF. \n\nThe studies were classified into the categories noted above in the collection description, and the location of the sites and the regions found on Google Earth. The files deposited here show the locations of these studies, according to the categories described above in the Collection Description, recorded as decimal degrees of latitude and longitude.

本数据集基于一项分析中筛选出的研究与调查点位，呈现生物文化方法对传粉者与传粉服务的贡献对生活质量产生影响的全球格局。本数据集的收集工作既是对《生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学政策平台 (Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, IPBES) 粮食生产中传粉者与传粉服务评估》的贡献的一部分，也是其额外补充内容。

数据集展示了本土与地方知识 (Indigenous and Local Knowledge, ILK) 发挥作用的调查点位分布，具体涉及以下四类场景：(a) 养蜂业；(b) 猎蜜活动；(c) 列入全球重要非物质文化遗产名录的项目；(d) 因对传粉者具有重要意义而被纳入《世界遗产名录 (World Heritage List, WHL)》的文化遗产及混合（文化/自然）遗产地。数据集还涵盖经筛选的研究与调查点位，这些点位中本土与地方知识被应用于传粉者保护实践，具体包括：培育传粉者筑巢资源的举措、传粉者与传粉资源心智地图、图腾崇拜、禁忌习俗、景观资源调控、生物时间指标应用，以及通过火耕激活传粉资源的手段。

数据集同时展示了三类已被证实本土与地方知识可助力传粉者保护的多样化农作系统的点位分布：轮作农业、家庭菜园与商品性农林业。此外，纳入了对传粉者及传粉服务具有贡献的全球重要农业文化遗产点位。本数据集包含发表于《自然·可持续性 (Nature Sustainability)》、可公开获取的配图支撑数据，这些配图并未收录于IPBES相关评估报告中。

数据溯源：本研究首先采用系统性流程（检索英文、西班牙文及法文文献）开展初始科学文献综述，并通过后续四个步骤实现本土与地方知识（ILK）的整合与分析¹⁰。第一步，面向希望贡献与传粉者及传粉服务相关信息的本土与地方知识持有者及专家发出全球呼吁，邀请其参与全球及社区对话。最终形成的全球及社区对话提供了亟需的信息与指导，并辅以本土与地方知识范围文献综述¹¹。第二步，本土与地方知识持有者与专家共同开发分析框架，以指导本项目开展。第三步，优先筛选那些有证据表明本土与地方知识持有者能够直接代表并验证自身知识的文献。第四步，开展空间分析，以定位与分析框架各主题相关的各国及区域数据综合成果与点位实例。本次分析的最终步骤包括：其一，以2015年（IPBES传粉报告的截止日期）之后发表的文献以及2016-2017年列入名录的遗产地与遗产元素更新综述内容；其二，重新分析通过对话调研¹¹与文献收集获得的数据，以契合IPBES概念框架 (IPBES CF) 的全部要素。

本次研究按照数据集说明中提及的类别进行分类，点位及区域坐标通过谷歌地球 (Google Earth) 获取。本数据集所存储的文件中，已按照前述分类标准记录各研究点位的经纬度坐标（以十进制度格式呈现）。