Data for: Corrosion resistance and cell compatibility in vitro of Chinese herbal extract coating on magnesium

Figure Captions
Fig. 1. SEM images of various coatings: (a) UMAO, (b) UMAO/CS, (c) UMAO/CS/IC(10V3 M), (d) UMAO/CS/IC(20V3M) and (e) UMAO/CS/IC(20V5M).
Fig. 2. SEM cross-section morphologies of various coatings: (a) UMAO, (b) UMAO/CS, (c) UMAO/CS/IC(10V3M), (d) UMAO/CS/IC(20V3M) and (e) UMAO/CS/IC(20V5M).
Fig. 3. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns and (b) FT-IR spectra of various coatings.
Fig. 4. (a) AFM images and (b) digital photographs of water droplets of various coatings.
Fig. 5. (a) Potentiodynamic polarization curves, (b) Nyquist plots, and (c) Bode plots of various samples. The symbols are the experimental data and the solid lines are fitting data.
Fig. 7. SEM images of cells cultured on various coatings: (a) UMAO, (b) UMAO/CS, and (c) UMAO/CS/IC.
Fig. 8. CLSM images of cells cultured for 0.5 h on various coatings: (a) UMAO, (b) UMAO/CS, and (c) UMAO/CS/IC.
Fig. 9. Adhesion of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on various coatings for 0.5, 1, 2, and 6 hours. Data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 4, (#) p < 0.05 and (##) p < 0.01 compared with those of UMAO, (*) p < 0.05 and (**) p < 0.01 compared with those of UMAO/CS.
Fig. 10. Proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on various coatings for 1, 3, and 5 days. Data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 4, (#) p < 0.05 and (##) p < 0.01 compared with those of UMAO, (*) p < 0.05 and (**) p < 0.01 compared with those of UMAO/CS.