Supplementary information files for "When are fact-checks effective? An experimental study on the inclusion of the misinformation source and the source of fact-checks in 16 European countries"
收藏DataCite Commons2025-06-13 更新2026-05-03 收录
下载链接:
https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/dataset/Supplementary_information_files_for_When_are_fact-checks_effective_An_experimental_study_on_the_inclusion_of_the_misinformation_source_and_the_source_of_fact-checks_in_16_European_countries_/29314721/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Supplementary files for article "When are fact-checks effective? An experimental study on the inclusion of the misinformation source and the source of fact-checks in 16 European countries"<br><br>Despite increasing academic attention, several questions about fact-checking remain unanswered. First, it remains unclear to what extent fact-checks are effective across different political and media contexts. Second, we know little on whether features of the fact-check itself influence its success. Conducting an experiment in 16 European countries, this study aims to fill these gaps by examining two features of fact-checks that may affect their success: whether fact-checks include the political source of the misinformation, and the source of the fact-check itself. We find that fact-checks are successful in debunking misperceptions. Moreover, this debunking effect is consistent across countries. Looking at features of fact-checks, we find no indication that it matters whether fact-checks include the political source of the misinformation claim. Comparing fact-checks from independent organizations with those from public broadcasters, we do find, however, that who the fact-checker is matters, especially in combination with trust in this source.<br><br>© The Author(s), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
提供机构:
Loughborough University
创建时间:
2025-06-13



