five

Supplementary Material for: In Preterm Infants, Length Growth below Expected Growth during Hospital Stay Predicts Poor Neurodevelopment at 2 Years

收藏
DataCite Commons2020-08-29 更新2024-07-27 收录
下载链接:
https://karger.figshare.com/articles/Supplementary_Material_for_In_Preterm_Infants_Length_Growth_below_Expected_Growth_during_Hospital_Stay_Predicts_Poor_Neurodevelopment_at_2_Years/6390599
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
<b><i>Background:</i></b> In preterm infants, neonatal weight growth is associated with neurodevelopmental outcome but is a poor indicator of growth quality. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of this work was to measure the relationship between neonatal length growth and the 2-year neurological outcome in preterm infants. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 2,403 infants enrolled in the LIFT cohort with gestational age less than 34 weeks were studied. Neonatal observed length growth (OLG) was calculated as the change in length <i>Z</i>-score between birth and discharge. Expected length growth (ELG) was estimated based on gestational age, birth weight <i>Z</i>-score, birth length <i>Z</i>-score, gender, and observed neonatal weight growth. The difference between OLG and ELG (∆<sub>OLG-ELG</sub>) was calculated as OLG – ELG, and infants were ranked into 3 classes depending on their ∆<sub>OLG-ELG</sub> (≤–0.5, –0.49 to 0.49, ≥0.50 <i>Z</i>-score). We explored the relationship between ∆<sub>OLG-ELG</sub> and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcome (<i>n</i> = 2,036), and, in a subgroup (<i>n</i> = 85), between ∆<sub>OLG-ELG</sub> and body composition at discharge. <b><i>Results:</i></b> ELG was strongly predicted from the above-mentioned parameters (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.73, <i>p</i> = 0.001). OLG correlated closely with gestational age (<i>p</i> = 0.001) but ∆<sub>OLG-ELG</sub> did not (<i>p</i> = 1.0). OLG was not associated with a 2-year nonoptimal outcome after adjustment for gestational age, but ∆<sub>OLG-ELG</sub> ≤–0.5 was; the crude and adjusted odds ratios were 1.63 and 1.56, respectively. ∆<sub>OLG-ELG</sub> correlated negatively with fat mass (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.006) before and after adjustment for gestational age. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> ∆<sub>OLG-ELG</sub> is a marker of neonatal growth that does not depend on gestational age, and may reflect quality of growth. A ∆<sub>OLG-ELG</sub> ≤–0.5 <i>Z</i>-score is associated with a higher risk for 2-year nonoptimal neurodevelopmental outcome.
提供机构:
Karger Publishers
创建时间:
2018-05-30
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务