RA – Diversification, quality signs, short circuit – Medium and large farms

# **Diversification, quality signs, short circuit by common** **Agreste – Agricultural Censuses (2010)** **** All farms (excluding collective grazing) Small farms Medium and large holdings Characteristic All holdings Holdings with diversification activities Diversification: Olive oil Diversification: Processing of dairy products Other processing of agricultural products Aquaculture production Agricultural work Non-agricultural work Forestry Wood processing including sawing Accommodation Restoration Leisure activities Handicrafts Other diversification Diversification of less than 10 % of the turnover Diversification from 10 % to less than 50 % of the CA Diversification from 50 % to less than 75 % of the CA Diversification of 75 % of turnover or more Holdings with a quality sign product Holdings with a quality sign AOC PGI or red label (excluding wine) Holdings marketing in short circuit (excluding wine) Short circuit constituting less than 10 % of the turnover (excluding wine) Short circuit constituting 10 % to less than 50 % of the turnover (excluding wine) Short circuit constituting 50 % to less than 75 % of the turnover (excluding wine) Short circuit constituting 75 % of turnover or more (excluding wine) Direct sale in own name or by separate legal unit (excluding wine) At least one family worker participates in diversification activities At least one permanent employee participates in diversification activities Farm description: Number of holdings concerned Utilised agricultural area (ha) Volume of work of the farms concerned (UTA) Volume of work provided by co-operators and family members (UTA) Standard gross production (thousand euros) * * * * # **The agricultural censuses,** ten-year surveys, offer an instant, complete and detailed picture of a key sector of the French and European economy: agriculture (agricultural population, plant areas, including vineyards, livestock numbers, means of production, ancillary activities, etc.). It answers questions as diverse as it is varied, at all geographical levels, allowing comparisons at the finest level (canton, common) and takes into account the local specificities as well as the new challenges of agriculture, such as signs of quality, territorial farm contracts, cultivation practices, etc. It is also interested in smaller farms and the important local impact. To prepare for the future of the agricultural world: The agricultural census makes it possible to measure the impact of agricultural policies, in particular the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), on agricultural practices and the environment. It gives political leaders, national elected officials and representatives of the profession keys to preparing future agricultural laws and regulations and international negotiations. It provides elected representatives of rural communes with valuable data for spatial management and spatial planning. The 2010 agricultural census follows the 1970, 1979, 1988 and 2000 censuses. The 2020 agricultural census will soon begin. The main data relate to: Crops and areas cultivated, Breeding and livestock, Methods of crop protection, Farm equipment, Diversification of activities (green tourism...), The marketing of products (AOC, direct sales to consumers, etc.), Employment (employee, family employment, etc.) and the level of training of the farmer, Management of the farm. There is no question about the financial results or the income of farmers. **Who was identified?** Investigators identified all production units meeting **3 criteria** > producing agricultural products; > have an independent day-to-day management; > attain or exceed a certain threshold in area, production or number of animals. **This threshold has been defined as follows**: > a utilised agricultural area (UAA) of 1 hectare or more; > **or** a specialised crop area greater than or equal to 20 ares; > **or** sufficient agricultural production activity, estimated in terms of number of animals, production area or minimum production volume.# **多元化、质量标识与直销短链** **阿格雷斯特——2010年农业普查** 所有农场（不含集体放牧） 小型农场 大中型经营主体 统计特征 所有经营主体 开展多元化经营的经营主体 多元化经营类别： 橄榄油加工 乳制品加工 其他农产品加工 水产养殖 农业劳务 非农劳务 林业 木材加工（含锯木） 住宿服务 餐饮服务 休闲活动 手工艺 其他多元化经营 多元化经营营业额占比层级： 占总营业额不足10% 占总营业额10%~不足50% 占总营业额50%~不足75% 占总营业额75%及以上 带有质量标识产品的经营主体 带有原产地命名控制（AOC）、地理标志保护（PGI）或红色质量标识的经营主体（不含酒类） 开展直销短链营销的经营主体（不含酒类） 直销短链营业额占比层级（不含酒类）： 占总营业额不足10% 占总营业额10%~不足50% 占总营业额50%~不足75% 占总营业额75%及以上 以自有名义或独立法人单位开展直销的经营主体（不含酒类） 至少有1名家庭雇工参与多元化经营的经营主体 至少有1名正式雇员参与多元化经营的经营主体 农场核心统计指标： 相关经营主体数量 农用土地使用面积（公顷） 相关农场的劳动量单位（UTA） 合作方与家庭成员提供的劳动量（UTA） 标准总产值（千欧元） 农业普查为十年一度的专项调查，可全面、即时且细致地呈现法国及欧洲经济的核心支柱产业——农业的全貌：涵盖农业从业人口、种植面积（含葡萄园）、牲畜存栏量、生产资料、辅助经营活动等。该普查可在各级地理尺度上回应多元调研需求，支持最精细层级（如县、市镇）的跨区域对比，同时兼顾地方特殊性与农业领域的新兴挑战，例如质量标识体系、地域农业契约、种植模式创新等，亦关注小型农场及其显著的地方带动效应。 为助力农业领域的长远发展：农业普查可用于量化评估农业政策——尤其是共同农业政策（CAP）——对农业生产方式与生态环境的影响。它可为政治决策者、全国民选代表及行业从业者提供制定未来农业法律法规、开展国际经贸谈判的核心依据。同时，它可为农村市镇的民选代表开展空间治理与规划提供宝贵的数据支撑。 本次2010年农业普查承接1970年、1979年、1988年及2000年的历次普查，2020年农业普查即将启动。 本次普查的核心数据涵盖： - 作物品类与种植面积 - 畜牧养殖与牲畜存栏情况 - 作物保护技术手段 - 农场生产设备配置 - 经营多元化情况（如绿色旅游等衍生业态） - 产品营销模式（如原产地命名控制产品、消费者直达直销等） - 就业结构（雇员、家庭雇工等）及农场主的受教育水平 - 农场经营管理状况 需说明的是，本次普查不涉及农户的财务成果或个人收入情况。 **调查对象如何确定？** 调查人员识别所有满足以下三项标准的生产单位： > 开展农产品生产； > 具备独立的日常经营管理权； > 达到或超过面积、产量或牲畜数量的划定阈值。 **该阈值定义如下**： > 农用土地使用面积（UAA）达1公顷及以上； > **或** 专业化种植面积≥20公亩； > **或** 具备足够的农业生产活动规模，以牲畜数量、种植面积或最低产值进行核算。