JET, iJET, and ET evaluation on the Huang dataset.

Comparison of JET and ET without clustering (top table) and with
clustering (bottom table). Without clustering, JET and ET
performance is comparable. JET performance with clustering is
computed when signals of conservation alone (JET - cons) and mixed
with information on physical-chemical (JET - cons+pc)
properties of residues are considered. Results in the Table are
averages of single runs of JET on proteins in the Huang dataset.
Performance of iJET is also presented for clustered residues which
have been obtained by a consensus of 7 runs over 10. Average
performance is computed on homodimer, heterodimer and transient
proteins in the Huang dataset. Average values computed for all
proteins (all confounded) are given; proteins belonging to different
categories (due to multiple chains establishing both homodimer and
heterodimer interfaces for instance), are only counted once. For
each type of interface, ET and iJET are compared and bold characters
indicate best performance.