JET, iJET, and ET evaluation on the Huang dataset.

Comparison of JET and ET without clustering (top table) and with clustering (bottom table). Without clustering, JET and ET performance is comparable. JET performance with clustering is computed when signals of conservation alone (JET - cons) and mixed with information on physical-chemical (JET - cons+pc) properties of residues are considered. Results in the Table are averages of single runs of JET on proteins in the Huang dataset. Performance of iJET is also presented for clustered residues which have been obtained by a consensus of 7 runs over 10. Average performance is computed on homodimer, heterodimer and transient proteins in the Huang dataset. Average values computed for all proteins (all confounded) are given; proteins belonging to different categories (due to multiple chains establishing both homodimer and heterodimer interfaces for instance), are only counted once. For each type of interface, ET and iJET are compared and bold characters indicate best performance.