Un dibattito tra filosofi: il peso del passato nella storicità della filosofia, da Parmenide ad Husserl, in Ferruccio De Natale

With these words Parmenides intends to say that nothing is created from nothing, and nothing can be destroyed into nothingness. Because philosophy can recognize as critical inquiry about the meaning of reality of who philosopher at all times and for all time, it can’t help but be aware of its incompleteness. The idea that our being in its continuous development through time, or rather time-traveling, but we can go back, accompanied, paradoxically, the idea that every moment of our present and even our future is and will be conditional, however, in perpetuity from our past. Says Ferruccio de Natale, who is a professor of theoretical philosophy, and teaches hermeneutic philosophy at the University of Bari Aldo Moro, in his new book The Presence of the Past, "The fact is that the past of philosophy emerges to understand the present [...] But you can also, in philosophy, finding there the possibility of returning to the past thought not subsequently developed out of date or of its time and, from these, to build understanding of its historical present. Exactly how is it that the return to Parmenides and twenty-five centuries ago, it was possible to build in Italian one of the most serious and studied theoretical systems of the twentieth century