Tussen minimum en modaal 1992-1996

<p>The effects of social levelling within the welfare state on the perception of the employed with lower incomes on their position and welfare. Way of contacting the respondent / number of employees working in the business where the respondent works / type of work: distasteful circumstances, irregular shifts, uncertain income, following courses for work in leisure time, financial risks, not enough people who want to do respondents job, experience and special qualifications are very important / respondent likes his job / for-against black economy, work on the side / frequency of work on the side in the Netherlands / acceptable earnings of work on the side in combination with job / respondent or member of household did ever work on the side / contacts with and size of circle of family, friends and acquaintances / any persons entitled to a benefit or immigrantse among the family, friends and acquaintances / identification with social group / persons entitled to a benefit or immigrants in the neighbourhood / active participation in a case of interest / ranking of activities in order of time spenditure / satisfaction about dwelling, social rights, health, education, respect of others, standard of living, possibilities for meeting people, neighbours, social position / statements about social injustice, about comparison of unemployed and employed with lower incomes / enough to say about work / work ethics / respondent had enough chances to get a fitting job / improvement of financial position of people with lower income / rights, duties and chances of unemployed / social benefits should rise-decline / abuse of social security benefits / preferential policy for immigrants / attitude towards immigrants / three most important social problems in the Netherlands / differences in income / actions in case of injustice of government / influence on political decisions / people living in poverty / detailed questions about personal and household income and spenditure / satisfaction with income / worrying about money / expectations about welfare of household, unemployment in the Netherlands, position of children in future / worrying about own future. Background variables: basic characteristics / housing situation / household characteristics / occupation / employment / income / capital assets / education / social class / politics / religion / organizational membership</p>本数据集聚焦于福利国家内部的社会均等化（social levelling）对低收入在职群体自身处境与福利感知的影响。其所覆盖的调查维度包括：受访者接触方式、受访者就职企业的雇员规模、工作类型（含令人不适的工作环境、不规律轮班、收入不稳定、需利用闲暇时间参与职业培训、存在财务风险、愿意从事该岗位的人员不足、经验与特殊资质至关重要）、受访者对自身工作的喜爱程度、对影子经济（black economy）的支持与反对态度、副业（work on the side）相关行为；荷兰国内副业的发生频率、副业与正职结合时的可接受收入水平、受访者或其家庭成员是否曾从事副业；与家人、朋友、熟人社交圈的联系情况及社交圈规模、社交圈亲友中是否有领取福利津贴者或移民、对社会群体的身份认同；社区内的福利领取者或移民情况、对感兴趣议题的主动参与度、按耗时对各类活动进行的排序；对住房、社会权利、健康、教育、他人尊重、生活水平、社交机会、邻里关系、社会地位的满意度；关于社会不公的观点、对失业者与低收入在职群体的对比性表述、对自身工作的评价充分度、工作伦理观念；受访者是否拥有足够机会获得适配岗位、对改善低收入群体财务状况的态度、失业群体的权利义务与机遇、社会福利水平的上调或下调倾向、社会保障福利的滥用情况、针对移民的优惠政策态度、对移民的整体态度；荷兰国内三大最突出的社会问题、收入差距问题、遭遇政府不公时的应对行动、对政治决策的影响力感知、贫困人口情况；关于个人与家庭收入及支出的详细问卷问题、对自身收入的满意度、财务方面的担忧情况；对家庭福利状况、荷兰国内失业率、子女未来处境的预期、对自身未来的担忧。背景变量涵盖：基础特征、住房状况、家庭特征、职业、就业情况、收入、金融资产、教育水平、社会阶层、政治倾向、宗教信仰、组织成员身份。