SI1-7.zip

Supplemental material for CP article: <br><br>Bouchal, J.M., Güner, T.H., Denk, T. 2018. Middle Miocene climate of southwestern Anatolia from multiple botanical proxies. Climates of the Past. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2018-76 <br> <b>S1</b>: A. Number of fossil-taxa (macrofossils and microfossils) from four middle Miocene localities (including one macrofossil horizon and four pollen zones - PZ) in the Yatağan Basin. B. All fossil-taxa recorded from four Yatağan Basin floras (14.8–13.2 Ma; MN6 into MN7–8). <b>S2</b>: Köppen-Geiger climate type signatures of all genera represented in micro and macrofloras of the Yatağan Basin. <b>S3</b>: Coding of leaf physiognomic characters for morphotypes from three macrofloras. Output pdf files from online CLAMP analysis (http://clamp.ibcas.ac.cn). <b>S4</b>: Heat maps showing precise representation of different Köppen-Geiger climate types for all fossil assemblages. <b>S5</b>: Köppen signature diagrams excluding cosmopolitan and gymnospermous taxa. <b>S6</b>: Arboreal to non-arboreal pollen ratios for three sections, of the Yatağan Basin. <b>S7</b>: Modern climate stations comparable to the middle Miocene climate of the Yatağan Basin, southwestern Anatolia. Climate data from Climate-Data.Org (https://sv.climate-data.org/info/sources/) and Ustaoğlu (2012). Selected Walter-Lieth climate diagrams illustrate qualitative difference between Euxinian-Hyrcanian and Japanese (Honshu) <i>Cf</i> climates. <br>