TABLE 2 in New cave species of Cyphoderus Nicolet and Pararrhopalites Bonet & Tellez (Hexapoda, Collembola) from Caatinga biome, Brazil

TABLE 2. Comparison between the Neotropical Pararrhopalites species.
SpeciesAnt. IV subsegmentsInterantennal modified short sensEyesCephalic dorsal spines (total)Trocantheral I, II, III chaetae Manubrium chaetae Dental dorsal chaetaeDental ventral chaetaeTenaculum chaetaeDistributionP. iataganii sp. nov.12+1+1135, 5(3), 56+6233, 2, 2, 1... 11 – 2BrazilP. anops 110?0+06 – 8?5+5193, 2, 1 … 11MexicoP. christianseni 29?2+212???173, 2, 2, 1 … 1?MexicoP. ecuadorensis 412?2+214?7+7224, 3, 2, 2, 1,(1),11EcuadorP. hennigi 29?2+210???122, 2, 2 …1?MexicoP. oculatus 19?2+212 – 14?5+5173, 2, 2, 1 … 11 – 2MexicoP. palaciosi 515–8+885, 5, 59+9254(3), 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 13BrazilP. papaveroi 310?0+014??163, 2, 2, 1... 1?BrazilP. queirozi 78+1+1115, 5, 54+4204, 2, 2, 1... 12BrazilP. sideroicus 59 – 11+0+0 or 1+1104, 4, 55+5214(3), 2, 2, 1... 12BrazilP. ubiquum 611+0+0114, 4, 55+5183, 2, 2, 1... 12BrazilP. wallacei 211?1+110???143, 2, 2, 1... 1*?Brazil
Legends: +: present; –: absent;?: doubtful or unknown; (): another possibility of number of chaetae; *: based on personal observation of the specimens. Species data based on: 1 Bonet
& Telez 1947; 2 Palacios-Vargas & Zeppelini 1996; 3 Zeppelini & Palacios-Vargas 1999; 4 Bretfeld & Trinklein 2000; 5 Zeppelini & Brito 2014; 6 Zeppelini et al. 2018; 7 Brito et al.
2019.