Aspergillus endocarditis: Diagnostic criteria and predictors of outcome, A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundFungal Endocarditis (FE), a relatively rare disease, has a high rate of mortality and is associated with multiple morbidities. Aspergillus endocarditis (AE) is severe form of FE. Incidence of AE has increased and is expected to rise due to an increased frequency of invasive procedures, cardiac devices and prosthetic valves together with increased use of immune system suppressors. AE lacks most of the clinical criteria used to diagnose infective endocarditis (IE), where blood culture is almost always negative, and fever may be absent. Diagnosis is usually late and in many cases is made post-mortem. Late or mistaken diagnosis of AE contribute to delayed and incorrect management of patients. In the current study we aimed to describe the clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics of AE, to identify predictors of early diagnosis of this serious infection.MethodsPatients with definite/possible IE, as diagnosed by the Kasr Al-Ainy IE Working Group from February 2005 through June 2016, were reviewed in this study. We compared the demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging criteria of AE patients to non-fungal IE patients.ResultsThis study included 374 patients with IE in which FE accounted for 43 cases. Aspergillus was the most common fungus (31 patients; 8.3%) in the patient group. Lack of fever and acute limb ischemia at presentation were significantly associated with AE (p ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to address diagnostic criteria for AE. Through multivariate regression analysis, absence of fever, HAE, PVE, and aortic abscess/pseudoaneurysm were strong predictors of AE. Use of these criteria my lead to earlier diagnoses of AE. Early treatment of AE patients with voriconazole in combination with other antifungal agents may be possible based on the previously mentioned criteria, which may facilitate better patient outcomes.