COMMUNICATIVE-PRAGMATIC STRATEGIES OF THE LINGUISTIC SUBJECT IN UZBEK LEGAL DISCOURSE

This article examines the communicative-pragmatic strategies employed by the linguistic subject in Uzbek legal discourse. The study explores the linguistic tools used to convey directives, obligations, prohibitions, and permissions within legal texts, including court decisions and notarial documents. The analysis demonstrates how these strategies reflect institutional authority, normative constraints, and hierarchical relations among legal actors. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of pragmatic mechanisms in Uzbek legal communication and the role of linguistic form in ensuring legal efficacy and formal clarity.