Data from: Time-of-day of infection: impact on liver stage malaria parasites in untreated and drug treated hosts

Background: Circadian clocks are thought to have evolved due to the benefits of anticipating daily environmental rhythms. Daily environmental rhythms that impact on fitness include interactions between organisms, such as host-pathogen interactions. For example, host susceptibility to infection for taxonomically diverse hosts and pathogens varies across the circadian cycle. We previously revealed that mosquito vectors are less susceptible to malaria (Plasmodium) infection during their active phase (night time) and here, we test whether a similar pattern occurs for infection of the mammalian host. Methods: We used Plasmodium berghei-infected Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes to infect mice during their rest or active phase, both in untreated and pyrimethamine-treated mice. We assessed the parasites’ success in establishing at the first site of replication (in the liver) by quantifying parasite burdens using qPCR, adjusted for sporozoite inocula. By independently manipulating the photoschedules of vectors and hosts, we standardise the time-of-day for parasites and mosquitoes used to initiate infections and thus directly test the impact of host time-of-day on the parasites’ ability to establish an infection. Results: The three experiments we conducted showed that pyrimethamine treatment reduced parasite liver burdens, but not in a biologically significant manner dependent on host time-of-day (active/rest phase). Furthermore, host time-of-day did not affect parasite liver burdens in untreated hosts. Conclusions: Understanding the roles of host, parasite and vector rhythms on malaria transmission is important given that mosquitoes are altering the time-of-day they bite. That rhythms per se do not affect vector to host transmission suggests that at the impacts of time-of-day on components of vectorial capacity are more epidemiologically influential than host rhythms.