Replication Data for: Checking for a Narrower Impact of White

Analysis of Republican Party of Minnesota v. White by political scientists shows that White had no appreciable effect on the conduct or outcome of judicial elections, including a comprehensive study of White has been by Bonneau, Hall, and Streb (2011). Yet there is reason to believe that White may have had a narrower impact than those authors originally allowed. An extension of their original analysis is conducted, with results showing that their findings are largely robust to more tailored model specifications. Exceptions include findings on ballot roll-off, but contradictory results further support the notion that White truly had no effect.政治学者针对《明尼苏达州共和党诉怀特案》（Republican Party of Minnesota v. White）开展的分析显示，该案对司法选举的进程与结果并未产生显著影响，其中博诺（Bonneau）、霍尔（Hall）与斯特雷布（Streb）2011年完成的相关研究即为一项针对该案的全面分析。然而，有理由认为怀特案的实际影响范围或许比上述三位学者最初认定的更为狭窄。本研究对他们的原始分析进行了拓展，结果表明，在采用更具针对性的模型设定后，他们的研究结论整体上依然稳健。唯一的例外是关于选票脱落（ballot roll-off）的研究结论，但与之相悖的结果进一步佐证了怀特案确实未产生任何影响这一观点。