LCC, ECC, and VEAC unreviewed areas
收藏Research Data Australia2025-12-20 收录
下载链接:
https://researchdata.edu.au/lcc-ecc-veac-unreviewed-areas/3901089
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
A GIS layer of areas, former cities, townships, and boroughs that have not been assessed or reviewed in an investigation by LCC, ECC, or VEAC. The Land Conservation Council Act 1970 excluded areas from public land use studies based on municipal status; this criteria was not included in the two subsequent Acts establishing the ECC and VEAC. The status of former cities, towns, and boroughs (outside the metropolitan Melbourne area) that were excluded from past studies and have not been subsequently assessed by the ECC or VEAC is shown as well as the current municipality. Note that several municipal areas were restructured during the interval of past studies and the status of recommendations in areas technically excluded at the time of final recommendations was treated variably (recommendations for the former City of South Barwon were accepted in Melbourne Study Area Final Recommendations (1977); recommendations for, City of Cranbourne, City of Seymour in Melbourne Area District 2 Review Final Recommendations (1994) were not accepted). A government response to accept any of these recommendations is taken to mean that the LCC’s recommendations apply.All municipalities except Queenscliffe were restructured between 1993 and 1995. Municipal boundaries at the time of LCC public land use studies, in most cases, do not reflect the current local government areas across the state.The beds of the Gippsland Lakes were excluded from all public land use investigations by the LCC, ECC and VEAC.Thematic land use reviews such as the LCC’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation, Wilderness Special Investigation, Historic Places Special Investigation South-Western Victoria, ECC’s Marine, Coastal & Estuarine Investigation covered specific types of public land that was within some of the excluded municipalities.
本数据集为地理信息系统 (GIS) 图层,涵盖未被土地保护委员会 (Land Conservation Council,LCC)、ECC及VEAC开展的调查中进行评估或审查的区域、原城市、镇区及自治市。1970年《土地保护委员会法案》曾基于市政地位将部分区域排除在公共土地利用研究之外,而后续两部设立ECC与VEAC的法案并未纳入该判定标准。本图层同时展示了墨尔本都会区以外、曾被过往研究排除且未被ECC或VEAC后续评估的原城市、镇区及自治市的现状,以及当前的市政辖区。请注意,部分市政区域在过往研究周期内经历了行政区划调整,因此针对最终建议阶段被技术性排除区域的相关建议,处理方式存在差异——例如1977年《墨尔本研究区域最终建议书》采纳了原南巴旺市 (South Barwon) 的相关建议;而1994年《墨尔本区域第2片区审查最终建议书》中,克兰伯恩市 (Cranbourne) 与西摩市 (Seymour) 的相关建议未获采纳。若政府回应采纳上述任一建议,则视为LCC的相关建议生效。1993年至1995年间,除昆克利夫 (Queenscliffe) 外的所有市政区域均完成了行政区划调整。在多数情况下,LCC开展公共土地利用研究时的市政边界,已无法反映该州当前的地方政府辖区范围。吉普斯兰湖 (Gippsland Lakes) 湖床被LCC、ECC与VEAC全部排除在公共土地利用调查范围之外。诸如LCC开展的《河流与溪流专项调查》《荒野专项调查》《维多利亚州西南部历史遗迹专项调查》,以及ECC开展的《海洋、海岸与河口调查》等主题性土地利用审查,均覆盖了部分被排除市政区域内的特定类型公共土地。
提供机构:
data.vic.gov.au



