five

Table 1_Efficacy and safety of Ginkgo biloba leaf extract injection for vascular cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.docx

收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-05-10 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_Efficacy_and_safety_of_Ginkgo_biloba_leaf_extract_injection_for_vascular_cognitive_impairment_a_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis_docx/31994364
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
BackgroundShuxuening injection (SXNI), a standardized injectable formulation of Ginkgo biloba leaf extract, is widely used in China for vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), However, evidence-based evaluation remains limited. MethodsRandomized controlled trials published before 1 September 2025, were searched in eight databases. Patients had vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), with the control group receiving conventional treatment and the treatment group receiving additional SXNI therapy. The primary outcome was the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), while secondary outcomes included the Hasegawa Dementia Scale (HDS), Barthel Index (BI), overall response rate, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and adverse event incidence. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Risk ratios (RR) were used for binary variables; mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for continuous variables. ResultsTwenty-two trials (n = 2,375) were included. All trials were conducted in China between 2005 and 2025. Compared with the control group, SXNI was associated with higher MMSE (MD 3.61, 95% CI 3.06–4.17), HDS (MD 1.30, 95% CI 0.21–2.39), and BI (MD 9.06, 95% CI 4.66–13.45), a higher overall response rate (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.21–1.33), and lower NIHSS (MD −6.17, 95% CI −7.90 to −4.45). Seven studies reported adverse events; and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.36–1.44). ConclusionThe addition of SXNI to conventional treatment may provide additional benefits in cognition, neurological function, and activities of daily living with no significant increase in reported adverse events compared with conventional treatment. However, the certainty of evidence is limited by methodological weaknesses and uncertainty regarding the comparability of preparations from different manufacturers. Therefore, high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings. Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=557472, identifier CRD42024557472.
创建时间:
2026-04-13
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务