raphaaal/schopenhauer-debate
收藏数据集概述
基本信息
- 许可证: MIT
- 任务类别: 表格问答
- 语言: 英语
- 名称: schopenhauer-debate
- 大小: 1K<n<10K
- 标签: finance, sbv, twitter, synthetic, debate
数据集描述
- 目的: 用于创建辩论代理的微调数据集,遵循Schopenhauer的策略。
- 内容: 包含1,000个合成对话,每个对话由一个对手的声明开始,包含1到5条推文进行辩论。
- 主题: 硅谷银行在Twitter上的运行辩论。
- 结构:
- 输入: 两个用户(对手和你)之间的对话开始。
- 标签: 赢得辩论的下一个响应 + 使用的Schopenhauer技巧。
示例
-
输入示例: json {"history": "<Opponent> Uninsured deposits had nothing to do with SVBs collapse. It was all about mismanagement. Stop blaming the depositors! <Opponent> <You> Mismanagement was indeed a factor, but the large share of uninsured deposits at SVB made it vulnerable. Its a risk that needs to be addressed. <You> <Opponent>: But not all banks with high uninsured deposits collapsed! Its not about the deposits, its about the banks investment strategies.<Opponent> "}
-
标签示例: json { "action_id": "10110" "response": "Oh, really? Well, lets talk about Washington Federal then. They had a whopping 88% of uninsured deposits in 2020, according to the FDIC, and theyre still standing. But heres the kicker: they have a completely different investment strategy than SVB. They focus on conservative, long-term investments. So, maybe, just maybe, its not just about the banks investment strategies, but also about the risk that comes with a high percentage of uninsured deposits." }
动作ID映射
- 详细描述了每个动作ID对应的辩论技巧。



