Data from: Topology, divergence dates, and macroevolutionary inferences vary between different tip-dating approaches applied to fossil theropods (Dinosauria)
收藏DataONE2016-06-21 更新2024-06-26 收录
下载链接:
https://search.dataone.org/view/null
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Dated phylogenies of fossil taxa allow palaeobiologists to estimate the timing of major divergences and placement of extinct lineages, and to test macroevolutionary hypotheses. Recently developed Bayesian ‘tip-dating’ methods simultaneously infer and date the branching relationships among fossil taxa, and infer putative ancestral relationships. Using a previously published dataset for extinct theropod dinosaurs, we contrast the dated relationships inferred by several tip-dating approaches and evaluate potential downstream effects on phylogenetic comparative methods. We also compare tip-dating analyses to maximum-parsimony trees time-scaled via alternative a posteriori approaches including via the probabilistic cal3 method. Among tip-dating analyses, we find opposing but strongly-supported relationships, despite similarity in inferred ancestors. Overall, tip-dating methods infer divergence dates often millions (or tens of millions) of years older than the earliest stratigraphic appearance of that clade. Model-comparison analyses of the pattern of body-size evolution found that the support for evolutionary mode can vary across and between tree-samples from cal3 and tip-dating approaches. These differences suggest that model and software choice in dating analyses can have a substantial impact on the dated phylogenies obtained and broader evolutionary inferences.
化石类群的定年系统发育树(dated phylogenies)可助力古生物学家估算主要分化事件的发生时序、明确已灭绝支系的系统发育位置,并检验宏进化假说(macroevolutionary hypotheses)。近年发展出的贝叶斯末端定年法(Bayesian tip-dating)可同时推断化石类群间的分支关系并为其定年,同时推测推定的祖先关系。
本研究利用一套已公开的灭绝兽脚类恐龙(theropod dinosaurs)数据集,对比多种末端定年法推断得到的定年系统发育关系,并评估其对系统发育比较方法(phylogenetic comparative methods)可能产生的后续影响。此外,本研究还将末端定年分析结果,与通过不同后验(a posteriori)方法(包括概率性cal3方法(cal3 method))完成时间校准的最大简约树(maximum-parsimony trees)进行了对比。
在末端定年分析中,尽管不同方法推断得到的祖先关系较为相似,但我们发现其得到的系统发育关系存在对立冲突,且均具有极高的统计支持度。总体而言,末端定年法推断出的类群分化时间,通常比该演化支(clade)最早的地层化石出现时间早数百万乃至数千万年。
针对体型演化模式的模型比较分析显示,基于cal3方法与末端定年法得到的树样本,其对演化模式(evolutionary mode)的支持度存在组内与组间差异。上述差异表明,在定年分析中选用的模型与软件,会对最终得到的定年系统发育树及更广泛的进化推论产生显著影响。
创建时间:
2016-06-21



