Data for: Network analysis of empathy items from the Interpersonal Reactivity Index in 1973 young adults

Information for data and supplementary materials of :

Briganti G., Kempenaers C. , Braun S., Fried E.I., Linkowski P. (2018). Network Analysis of empathy items from the Interpersonal Reactivity Index in 1973 young adults. Psychiatry Research

Corresponding author : [e-mail]

The supplementary materials zip file contains 3 files.
_____________________
1)Supplementary Figures

Figure 2bis: three centrality estimates for the 28-item IRI, including closeness and betweenness centrality.

Figure 3: bootstrapped confidence intervals of all edge weights of the estimated network; details in Epskamp, Borsboom & Fried, 2017.

Figure 4: edge weight difference test for the estimated network; details in Epskamp, Borsboom & Fried, 2017.

Figure 5 : centrality stability for the estimated network ; details in Epskamp, Borsboom & Fried, 2017.

Figure 6: centrality-difference test for the estimated network; details in Epskamp, Borsboom & Fried, 2017.

Figure Description : brief description of the figures.

___________________
2) Data
data: the dataset from our 1973 young adults.

____________________
3) Supplementary R-Files

boot1davis.RData, boot2davis.Rdata: results of bootnet stability analysis.

Briganti2018_Network_empathy_Syntax.R: full code.

Details_R_packages: details and specs of the packages used for the analysis.

____________________
References

Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Fried EI. Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper. Behavior Research Methods. Behavior Research Methods; 2017; 1–34. doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1

本数据集及补充材料对应文献如下：

Briganti G.、Kempenaers C.、Braun S.、Fried E.I.、Linkowski P. (2018). 针对1973名年轻人的人际反应指针量表（Interpersonal Reactivity Index, IRI）共情条目网络分析. 《精神病学研究》(Psychiatry Research)

通讯作者：[e-mail]

本补充材料压缩包内含3个文件：
——————
1) 补充图表
图2bis：针对28条目IRI的3项中心性估计值，涵盖接近中心性（closeness centrality）与介数中心性（betweenness centrality）。
图3：所估计网络的全部边权重（edge weight）的自举置信区间；方法细节参见Epskamp、Borsboom与Fried, 2017。
图4：所估计网络的边权重差异检验；方法细节参见Epskamp、Borsboom与Fried, 2017。
图5：所估计网络的中心性稳定性；方法细节参见Epskamp、Borsboom与Fried, 2017。
图6：所估计网络的中心性差异检验；方法细节参见Epskamp、Borsboom与Fried, 2017。
图表说明：各图表的简要描述。

——————
2) 数据集
data：本研究针对1973名年轻人采集的原始数据集。

——————
3) 补充R脚本文件
boot1davis.RData、boot2davis.Rdata：bootnet稳定性分析结果。
Briganti2018_Network_empathy_Syntax.R：完整分析代码。
Details_R_packages：本研究分析所用R包的详细信息与规格说明。

——————
参考文献

Epskamp S、Borsboom D、Fried EI. 心理网络估计及其准确性评估：一篇教程论文. 《行为研究方法》(Behavior Research Methods); 2017; 1–34. doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1