Dataset of "A Meta-analysis on the Success of Resin Composite Restorations Since 2010"
收藏Mendeley Data2021-07-20 更新2026-04-09 收录
下载链接:
https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/7k9sg622g7/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
This dataset consists of data extracted from the following studies: 1. Rocha A, Salas MS, Masotti A, da Rosa W, Zanchi C, Lund R. A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial of Dentin Surface Treatments for Composite Restorations in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A 36-month Evaluation. Operative dentistry. 2019;44(2):114-26. 2. Dilsad OF, Ergin E, Attar N, Gurgan S. Comparison of laser-and bur-prepared class I cavities restored with two different low-shrinkage composite resins: a randomized, controlled 60-month clinical trial. Clinical oral investigations. 2020;24(1):357-68. 3. Gurgan S, Vural UK, Kutuk ZB, Cakir FY. Does a new formula have an input in the clinical success of posterior composite restorations? A chat study. Clinical oral investigations. 2021;25(4):1715-27. 4. Loguercio A, Rezende M, Gutierrez M, Costa T, Armas-Vega A, Reis A. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations. Journal of dentistry. 2019;85:93-102. 5. Kitasako Y, Sadr A, Burrow M, Tagami J. Thirty‐six month clinical evaluation of a highly filled flowable composite for direct posterior restorations. Australian dental journal. 2016;61(3):366-73. 6. Celik EU, Tunac AT, Yilmaz F. Three-year clinical evaluation of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in non-carious cervical lesions: a randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial. Clinical oral investigations. 2019;23(3):1473-80. 7. Cieplik F, Scholz KJ, Tabenski I, May S, Hiller K-A, Schmalz G, et al. Flowable composites for restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: Results after five years. Dental materials. 2017;33(12):428-37. 8. Favetti M, Schroeder T, Montagner AF, Correa MB, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. Effectiveness of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine in restoration retention: a 36-month follow-up randomized clinical trial. Journal of dentistry. 2017;60:44-9.
本数据集提取自以下已发表研究:1. 罗查A、萨拉斯MS、马索蒂A、达罗萨W、赞奇C、伦德R. 非龋性颈损(Noncarious Cervical Lesions)复合树脂修复体(Composite Restorations)的牙面处理随机双盲临床试验(Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial):36个月随访评估[J]. 牙体修复杂志(Operative Dentistry). 2019;44(2):114-26. 2. 迪尔萨德OF、埃尔金E、阿特塔N、古根S. 两种低收缩复合树脂修复激光与车针预备I类洞的对比:一项随机对照60个月临床试验[J]. 口腔临床研究(Clinical Oral Investigations). 2020;24(1):357-68. 3. 古根S、武拉尔UK、库图克ZB、卡基尔FY. 新型配方对后牙复合树脂修复体临床成功率的影响?一项聊天研究[J]. 口腔临床研究(Clinical Oral Investigations). 2021;25(4):1715-27. 4. 洛格西奥A、雷曾德M、古铁雷斯M、科斯塔T、阿马斯-维加A、赖斯A. 后牙大块充填树脂复合修复体的随机36个月随访研究[J]. 牙科杂志(Journal of Dentistry). 2019;85:93-102. 5. 北坂洋、萨德尔A、伯罗M、塔加米J. 高充填流动复合树脂直接后牙修复的36个月临床评估[J]. 澳大利亚牙科杂志(Australian Dental Journal). 2016;61(3):366-73. 6. 切利克EU、图纳克AT、伊尔马兹F. 非龋性颈损高黏度玻璃离子修复体的3年临床评估:一项随机对照分口临床试验[J]. 口腔临床研究(Clinical Oral Investigations). 2019;23(3):1473-80. 7. 西普利克F、肖尔茨KJ、塔本斯基I、梅S、希勒K-A、施马尔茨G等. 非龋性颈损流动复合树脂修复:5年随访结果[J]. 牙科材料学杂志(Dental Materials). 2017;33(12):428-37. 8. 法韦蒂M、施罗德T、蒙塔涅尔AF、科雷亚MB、佩雷拉-森西T、森西MS. 氯己定(Chlorhexidine)预处理对修复体固位的有效性:一项36个月随访随机临床试验[J]. 牙科杂志(Journal of Dentistry). 2017;60:44-9.
创建时间:
2021-07-20



