five

Data Sheet 1_Integrative multi-omic profiling in blood reveals distinct immune and metabolic signatures between ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis.zip

收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-05-10 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Integrative_multi-omic_profiling_in_blood_reveals_distinct_immune_and_metabolic_signatures_between_ACPA-negative_and_ACPA-positive_rheumatoid_arthritis_zip/30476075
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
ObjectiveTo investigate whether patients with ACPA-negative (ACPA–) and ACPA-positive (ACPA+) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exhibit distinct immune and metabolic profiles in blood, using integrative proteomic and metabolomic analyses. By uncovering subgroup-specific molecular signatures, we aim to improve the biological understanding of RA heterogeneity and support the development of more precise diagnostic and stratification strategies. MethodsWe performed high-throughput proteomic and metabolomic profiling on plasma from a well-characterized cohort comprising 40 patients with ACPA– RA, 40 patients with ACPA+ RA, and 40 healthy controls. To identify key immune and metabolic differences, we applied statistical comparisons, pathway enrichment analyses, and network inference methods. Additionally, an integrative network-based machine learning framework was used to distinguish RA subgroups from controls based on plasma molecular profiles. ResultsACPA– and ACPA+ RA exhibited distinct plasma proteomic and metabolomic biomolecular signatures. Complement proteins (CFB, CFHR5, and F9) and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL1RN were exclusively elevated in ACPA– RA and remained distinct in a treatment-naïve sub-cohort. Metabolomic analysis revealed subgroup-specific differences in lipid and pyrimidine metabolism, including contrasting patterns in bilirubin-derived metabolites. Correlation analyses identified differential associations between molecular features and clinical inflammatory markers across RA subgroups. An integrative machine learning framework incorporating multi-omic features achieved high classification performance in cross-validation (AUC ≥ 0.90), outperforming models based on single-omic data. ConclusionThis study suggests that ACPA status may not fully capture the biological heterogeneity between ACPA– and ACPA+ RA subgroups, indicating additional immune and metabolic distinctions that warrant further investigation. Our findings highlight the potential of multi-omic profiling to enhance RA diagnostics, refine disease stratification, and inform subgroup-specific disease management strategies.
创建时间:
2025-10-29
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务