Moving Stimuli Are Less Effectively Masked Using Traditional Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) Compared to a Moving Mondrian Mask (MMM): A Test Case for Feature-Selective Suppression and Retinotopic Adaptation
收藏DataCite Commons2025-06-01 更新2024-07-25 收录
下载链接：
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Moving_Stimuli_Are_Less_Effectively_Masked_Using_Traditional_Continuous_Flash_Suppression_CFS_Compared_to_a_Moving_Mondrian_Mask_MMM_A_Test_Case_for_Feature_Selective_Suppression_and_Retinotopic_Adaptation/1194579/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务：
资源简介：
These are the data reported in: Moors P, Wagemans J, de-Wit L (2014) Moving Stimuli Are Less Effectively Masked Using Traditional Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) Compared to a Moving Mondrian Mask (MMM): A Test Case for Feature-Selective Suppression and Retinotopic Adaptation. PLoS ONE 9(5): e98298. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098298 Two files contain the experimental data, one the simulation data, and the last one the explanation of all the variables in the three data files.
提供机构：
figshare
创建时间：
2016-01-19
