five

Could a Global Flood Produce All Earth's Oil?

收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-05-02 收录
下载链接:
https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/dwtm7dhvw2
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
🔥 Why this study matters Can vast petroleum systems form fast? This paper integrates lab results, natural hydrothermal analogs, and global carbon mass-balance to test whether Earth’s ~9 trillion barrels of petroleum-equivalent hydrocarbons (including oil shale + tar sands) could arise within a young-Earth timeline under catastrophic conditions. ⚡ Core claim (TL;DR) Given (1) a far more productive pre-Flood biosphere, (2) rapid, anoxic burial, and (3) short-lived but intense thermal/tectonic pulses, petroleum can be generated, expelled, migrated, and trapped in years to decades—with unconverted organics remaining as coal and kerogen. Modern geochemistry shows reaction rates scale with heat/pressure, not calendar time. 🔍 What’s inside Mass-balance accounting: Converts global reserves (~3 T bbl conventional + ~6 T bbl shale ≈ ~9 T bbl) to required biomass using ~10,000:1 conversion baselines; explores higher-efficiency scenarios under catastrophic conditions. Pre-Flood productivity: Paleo-oxygen, fossil gigantism, and vegetation reconstructions support 100–1,000× modern biomass; floating-forest/wetland models address coal and lignite volumes. Rapid generation evidence: Laboratory oil formation in days–years under elevated T/P. Natural analogs (e.g., hydrothermal systems like Guaymas Basin) producing gasoline-range hydrocarbons today with radiocarbon-measured young oils. Pathways & partitions: Why most fossil organic matter persists as kerogen, a smaller share as coal, and a fraction as oil/gas—and how tar sands fit as degraded oils. Comparative framework: Side-by-side of YEC catastrophic vs conventional gradualist models; notes on abiogenic contributions as a potential minor source. 📊 Figures & visuals overview Petroleum resource breakdown (crude, shale, tar sands) Biomass requirements: conventional vs accelerated (log-scale) Radiometric summaries of “young” oils Biotic vs abiotic formation pathways Pre-Flood biomass scenarios (modern, 10×, 100×, 1,000×) Timescale comparison (millions of years vs years–decades) 🧪 Key takeaways Rates are conditional: With sufficient heat/pressure, oil-forming reactions do not require geologic ages. Front-loaded system: A single, global burial event can “short-circuit” decay, maximizing preservation and conversion efficiency. Consistency check: The scale, chemistry, and distribution of global petroleum are consistent with catastrophic burial plus rapid thermal processing, while explaining coal/kerogen abundance.
创建时间:
2025-09-03
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作