Parkeren in perifere werkgebieden in de Randstad 1988

Investigation of effectiveness and negative side-effects of parking-measures, aimed at reducing rush-hour traffic and car use in general. The study investigates secondary and tertiary effects of policy-measures with regard to parking. Secondary effects relate to choice between transportation alternatives, tertiary effects to location behaviour of both employees and firms. The study consists of five sub studies: 1. P1024A: Screening of car-drivers to single out commuters, working in nine selected peripheral working areas ( Amsterdam Sloterdijk, Amsterdam Zuid, Amsterdam Zuidoost, Den Haag Bezuidenhout, Schiphol, Rotterdam Noordoost, Den Haag Laakhavens, Rijswijk Plaspoelpolders, Hoofddorp Beukenhorst ). Data on: commuting-time / choice of alternative way of transport if not by car.( N=1124 ) 2. P1024B: Stated preference questionnaire filled out by screened respondents. Data on: preferred transportation alternatives / parking: search-time, costs, walking distance / will parking measures make respondent change job? /car-allowance / job requires use of car? ( N=596 ) 3. P1024C: Tertiary effects of parking measures on employees who recently changed job. Comparison of commuting data of current and former job: distance / means of transportation / parking / parking costs / car allowance / relative importance of factors influencing choice of job / relative importance of commuting factors in choice of current job. ( N=153 ) 4. P1024D: Tertiary effects of parking measures on newly employed. Commuting situation / relative importance of commuting factors in accepting this job / moving / car ownership. ( N=74 ) 5. P1024E: Tertiary effects of parking measures on firms. Parking situation / number of car-commuters employed / public transport connections / will parking measures lead to relocation of the firm? ( N=201 ) Background variables: basic characteristics/ residence/ place of work/ income/capital assets/ education

本研究旨在探究停车管控措施的实施效果与负面副作用，以期缓解高峰时段交通拥堵并整体降低私家车使用量。本研究聚焦于停车相关政策措施的二级效应（secondary effects）与三级效应（tertiary effects）：二级效应涉及交通出行方式的选择，三级效应则关乎雇员与企业的区位选择行为。
本研究包含五项子研究：
1. P1024A：针对在9个选定的外围办公区域（阿姆斯特丹斯洛特迪克（Amsterdam Sloterdijk）、阿姆斯特丹南区（Amsterdam Zuid）、阿姆斯特丹东南区（Amsterdam Zuidoost）、海牙贝祖因霍特（Den Haag Bezuidenhout）、史基浦机场（Schiphol）、鹿特丹东北区（Rotterdam Noordoost）、海牙拉卡港（Den Haag Laakhavens）、赖斯韦克普拉斯波尔德工业区（Rijswijk Plaspoelpolders）、霍夫多普比肯霍斯特区（Hoofddorp Beukenhorst））工作的驾车人群开展筛查，以筛选出通勤者。采集数据包括：通勤时长、非自驾时的替代出行方式选择。有效样本量N=1124。
2. P1024B：对已完成筛查的受访者开展陈述偏好（stated preference）问卷调研。采集数据包括：偏好的出行方式与停车相关信息（寻车时长、停车成本、步行距离）、停车管控措施是否会促使受访者更换工作、通勤补贴、工作是否要求使用私家车。有效样本量N=596。
3. P1024C：针对近期更换工作的雇员，探究停车管控措施的三级效应。对比其当前与过往工作的通勤数据，涵盖通勤距离、出行方式、停车情况、停车成本、通勤补贴、影响工作选择的各类因素的相对重要性、当前工作选择中通勤相关因素的相对重要性。有效样本量N=153。
4. P1024D：针对新入职雇员，探究停车管控措施的三级效应。采集数据包括：通勤现状、入职该工作时通勤相关因素的相对重要性、迁居情况、私家车保有量。有效样本量N=74。
5. P1024E：针对企业主体，探究停车管控措施的三级效应。采集数据包括：停车现状、自驾通勤雇员数量、公共交通接驳情况、停车管控措施是否会促使企业搬迁。有效样本量N=201。
背景变量涵盖：基础特征、居住地、工作地、收入、可支配资产、受教育程度。