Data for: A test of the general occurrence and predictive utility of isochronal, equiproportional, ‘variable proportional’, and ‘mixed’ development among arthropods

Supplementary File 2. Contains the datasets extracted for each species from each study (‘Input Data’), an R code (‘EPD tests code’) written by the author to test each dataset for ICD, EPD, and linear and quadratic forms of VPD and produce AICC values, cross-validation errors, and summary output for each of these development models, and the R output of analyses performed with this code on each species’ dataset (‘Output Data’).

Supplementary File 3. Contains Tables S3 and S4.

Table S3. Summary of performance metrics calculated for each development model [ICD, EPD, VPD (Lin), and VPD (Quad)] for each species’ dataset tested, including model AICC, Δi, rank based on AICC (1-4), cross-validation error, pseudo-R2, and mean raw (in d) and percent (%) absolute prediction errors calculated for each species’ dataset. Whether conditions for concluding ICD or EPD were met by the data is also outlined. Whether original studies reported full development times and if each species had anamorphic or metamorphic development is also listed. The number of developmental stages whose proportions were significantly affected by temperature or not is also listed, as well as the proportion of stages with significant temperature effects, and thus whether or not the species had mixed development. The studies cited in this table are provided with Table S2 in Supplementary File 1.

Table S4. The proportions of total development spent by each of the species examined in this study in each of their immature developmental stages, as predicted based on the parameters of development models fit to them using GLMs in the present study. For all equations, the predicted proportions were back-transformed from arcsine-square-roots. Equations are included as Excel formulae, and those for VPD models are linked to values in the first column representing temperature (set to an arbitrary value of 15°C in this file). Whether the developmental proportion of each stage was significantly affected by temperature is also indicated (1 = affected, 0 = not affected) in the columns to the right of each VPD model’s column. Whether each developmental stage was feeding or non-feeding is also listed. The studies cited in this table are provided with Table S2 in Supplementary File 1.

补充文件2。包含从各项研究中为各物种提取的数据集（"输入数据（Input Data）"）、作者编写的R代码（"EPD检验代码（EPD tests code）"），该代码用于检验各数据集的ICD、EPD以及水汽压亏缺（Vapor Pressure Deficit）的线性与二次形式，可生成各发育模型的修正赤池信息准则（AICC）值、交叉验证误差与汇总结果，以及基于该代码对各物种数据集开展分析得到的R分析输出（"输出数据（Output Data）"）。

补充文件3包含表S3与表S4。

表S3。汇总了针对各测试物种数据集的各发育模型[ICD、EPD、线性VPD（VPD (Lin)）与二次VPD（VPD (Quad)）]计算得到的性能指标，包括模型的修正赤池信息准则（AICC）值、Δi值、基于AICC的排序（1~4）、交叉验证误差、伪决定系数（pseudo-R²），以及各物种数据集的平均原始绝对预测误差（单位：天(d)）与百分比绝对预测误差。同时概述了数据是否满足推断ICD或EPD的条件，列出了原始研究是否报道了完整发育时长，以及各物种是否存在无变态发育或变态发育。此外还统计了发育阶段中受温度显著影响与未受显著影响的数量，以及存在温度显著影响的发育阶段占比，进而判断该物种是否存在混合发育模式。本表引用的研究信息详见补充文件1中的表S2。

表S4。呈现了本研究涉及的各物种在各未成熟发育阶段中所花费的总发育时长占比，该占比基于本研究中通过广义线性模型（Generalized Linear Models, GLMs）拟合的发育模型参数预测得到。所有方程的预测占比均从反正弦平方根变换中进行了反转换。方程以Excel公式形式呈现，其中VPD模型的方程与第一列的温度数值关联（本文件中该温度预设为任意值15℃）。在各VPD模型列右侧的列中，还标注了各发育阶段的发育占比是否受温度显著影响（1代表受影响，0代表未受影响）。同时列出了各发育阶段属于取食阶段还是非取食阶段。本表引用的研究信息详见补充文件1中的表S2。