LCC, ECC, and VEAC unreviewed areas
收藏Research Data Australia2025-12-20 收录
下载链接:
https://researchdata.edu.au/lcc-ecc-veac-unreviewed-areas/3901488
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
A GIS layer of areas, former cities, townships, and boroughs that have not been assessed or reviewed in an investigation by LCC, ECC, or VEAC. The Land Conservation Council Act 1970 excluded areas from public land use studies based on municipal status; this criteria was not included in the two subsequent Acts establishing the ECC and VEAC. The status of former cities, towns, and boroughs (outside the metropolitan Melbourne area) that were excluded from past studies and have not been subsequently assessed by the ECC or VEAC is shown as well as the current municipality. Note that several municipal areas were restructured during the interval of past studies and the status of recommendations in areas technically excluded at the time of final recommendations was treated variably (recommendations for the former City of South Barwon were accepted in Melbourne Study Area Final Recommendations (1977); recommendations for, City of Cranbourne, City of Seymour in Melbourne Area District 2 Review Final Recommendations (1994) were not accepted). A government response to accept any of these recommendations is taken to mean that the LCC’s recommendations apply.All municipalities except Queenscliffe were restructured between 1993 and 1995. Municipal boundaries at the time of LCC public land use studies, in most cases, do not reflect the current local government areas across the state.The beds of the Gippsland Lakes were excluded from all public land use investigations by the LCC, ECC and VEAC.Thematic land use reviews such as the LCC’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation, Wilderness Special Investigation, Historic Places Special Investigation South-Western Victoria, ECC’s Marine, Coastal & Estuarine Investigation covered specific types of public land that was within some of the excluded municipalities.
本数据集为地理信息系统(GIS)图层,涵盖未被土地保护委员会(LCC)、环境与保护委员会(ECC)及维多利亚环境评估委员会(VEAC)开展的调查所评估或审查的区域、原城市、镇区及自治市范围。1970年《土地保护委员会法案》曾依据市政地位将部分区域排除在公共土地使用研究之外,但后续两部设立ECC与VEAC的法案未纳入该判定标准。本图层同时标注了墨尔本大都市区以外、既往研究中被排除且未被ECC或VEAC后续评估的原城市、镇区及自治市的现状,以及其当前所属市政辖区。需注意,部分市政辖区在既往研究的间隔期内经历了行政区划调整,且最终建议出台时被技术上排除的区域,其相关建议的处理方式存在差异:原南巴旺市(City of South Barwon)的相关建议在1977年《墨尔本研究区最终建议》中获得采纳;而克兰伯恩市(City of Cranbourne)、西摩市(City of Seymour)在1994年《墨尔本地区第2行政区审查最终建议》中提出的相关建议未获采纳。若政府回应采纳其中任意一项建议,则视为LCC的相关建议生效。除昆斯克利夫(Queenscliffe)外,全州所有市政辖区均在1993年至1995年间完成了行政区划调整。在多数情况下,LCC开展公共土地使用研究时的市政边界,已无法反映全州当前的地方政府辖区范围。吉普斯兰湖(Gippsland Lakes)湖床被LCC、ECC及VEAC全部排除在公共土地使用调查范围之外。诸如LCC开展的《河流与溪流专项调查》《荒野专项调查》《维多利亚州西南部历史遗迹专项调查》,以及ECC开展的《海洋、海岸与河口调查》等专题土地使用审查,均覆盖了部分被排除市政辖区内的特定类型公共土地。
提供机构:
data.vic.gov.au



