Replication Data for "The Impact of the Economy on Presidential Elections throughout US History"

As numerous studies in the US and elsewhere document, voters hold incumbents accountable for the economy. However, our knowledge of the conditions that allow voters to do so remains incomplete. In particular, most findings about economic voting come from studies of modern economies (post World War II). Modern economies have a host of characteristics that seem to lend them-elves to economic voting. Their governments play a large role in the economy and have the Keynesian toolset necessary to influence conditions. Their voters are educated and have access to rich economic data from ubiquitous media. Are these and other modern conditions necessary for economic voting? Or, would voters still hold politicians accountable even under adverse conditions? Using economic measures now available back to the 1790s, we study economic voting from the earliest days of the US Republic when none of these conditions were met. Voters, we find, appear to judge incumbent presidents on the economy all the way back to George Washington. Consistent with this pattern, we also find that the economy appears to shape presidents' decisions to run again throughout US history. These findings support recent comparative evidence that economic voting is pervasive across a variety of contexts.