Mentoring Up De-Identified Dataset

We provide here the de-identified data used to evaluate the implementations of a Mentoring Up training. This dataset is currently being used in the publishing of a manuscript, "Mentoring Up for Early Career Investigators: Empowering Mentees to Proactively Engage in their Mentoring Relationships" Variables include, Values for average self-ratings of Mentoring Competencies using the MCA scale (Likert-type scale from 1 - 7), retrospectively thinking to BEFORE the training and AFTER the training. Subscales include: Effective Communication Aligning Expectations Assessing Understanding Fostering Independence Addressing Diversity Promoting Professional Development Values also include responses to the following quantitative questions: Overall, how effective was the facilitator in guiding discussion during the workshop? (1 - Very Ineffective, 2 - Ineffective, 3 - Neither Effective nor Ineffective, 4 - Effective, 5 - Very Effective) Was attending this workshop a valuable use of your time? (1 - Yes, 2 - No) How likely are you to recommend this workshop to other colleagues? (1 - Very Unlikely, 2 - Unlikely, 3 - Undecided, 4 - Likely, 5 - Very Likely) Have you made, or do you plan to make any changes in your own practices as a mentee or in your relationship with your mentor(s) as a result of this training? (1 - Yes, 2 - No) And the following short answer responses: Please describe any changes you plan to make as a result of this workshop What aspects of this workshop did you find most useful? What could be done to improve this workshop What are the strengths and weaknesses of this training? Are there things you would like to see changed or added? If so, what?本数据集提供了用于评估Mentoring Up培训（Mentoring Up Training）实施效果的去标识化数据。目前该数据集正用于一篇题为《面向早期职业研究者的Mentoring Up培训：赋能被指导者主动参与导师指导关系》（"Mentoring Up for Early Career Investigators: Empowering Mentees to Proactively Engage in their Mentoring Relationships"）的手稿发表工作。 本次数据集包含的变量包括： 采用MCA量表（MCA scale）的指导能力平均自评得分，该量表为李克特式量表（Likert-type scale，1-7分计分），用于回溯评估培训前与培训后的表现。该量表的子维度包括： - 有效沟通 - 期望对齐 - 理解评估 - 独立性培养 - 多样性应对 - 职业发展促进 同时包含以下量化问题的作答结果： - 总体而言，本次工作坊的培训引导师（facilitator）在引导讨论环节中的表现效果如何？（1分=完全无效，2分=无效，3分=既非有效亦非无效，4分=有效，5分=非常有效） - 你认为参加本次工作坊是否物有所值？（1分=是，2分=否） - 你向其他同事推荐本次工作坊的可能性有多大？（1分=极不可能，2分=不太可能，3分=不确定，4分=可能，5分=非常可能） - 你是否已经或计划根据本次培训的内容，在自身作为被指导者的实践中，或是在与导师的合作关系中做出相应调整？（1分=是，2分=否） 此外还包含以下简答题的作答结果： - 请描述你计划因本次工作坊做出的各项调整 - 你认为本次工作坊中哪些环节最具实用性？ - 可通过哪些方式优化本次工作坊？ - 本次培训的优势与不足分别是什么？你是否希望对其进行调整或补充？若有，请具体说明。