Dataset Supporting Deliverable 1.5 - New approaches and best practices for closing the material cycles within symbiosis cluster

Dataset containing the data the support the experimental findings described in ULTIMATE delivarable 1.5. This deliverable is available on Zenodo under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14967803 In concerns the following: Case Study 3 (Rosignano, Italy) - Use of by-products of local industries for wastewater treatment in Rosignano Table 3.1. Design parameters of the adsorption columns. Figure 3.1. Dose curve of the AOP Pilot Plant Table 3.2. Hardness and COD removal during laboratory tests. Figure 3.2 Conductivity values in the inlet and outlet streams Figure 3.3 pH values in the inlet and outlet streams. Figure 3.4 Alkalinity values in the inlet and outlet streams. Figure 3.5 CO3- concentration values in the inlet and outlet streams. Figure 3.6 HCO3- concentration values in the inlet and outlet streams. Figure 3.7 OH- concentration values in the inlet and outlet streams. Figure 3.8 Temporary and permanent hardness removal Figure 3.9 Hardness removal efficiency. Table 3.3. Results of Jar Test experiments using coagulant solution recovered from aluminium sludge Table 3.4. General characteristics of the activated carbon used Figure 3.10 Breakthrough curve of UV254 and fluorescence signal from real-time sensors during adsorption Test 1. Figure 3.11 Breakthrough curve of UV254 and fluorescence signal from real-time sensors during adsorption Test 2. Figure 3.12 Breakthrough curve of carbamazepine and primidone during the two adsorption experimental tests Table 3.5. Observed correlation between spectroscopic sensors’ signals and monitored emerging contaminants Figure 3.13 Observed correlation between sulfamethoxazole and fluorescence during adsorption Test 2. C0 and F0 are observed concentration of the contaminant and fluorescence signal in the influent, respectively Figure 3.14 Fluorescence spectra of the wastewater influent to the AOP pilot plant collected at different days Figure 3.15 Fluorescence signal of the influent and effluent of the AOP pilot plant recorded in real-time Figure 3.16 Observed concentrations of primidone and clarithromycin in the influent (blu indicator) and effluent (orange indicator) of the AOP pilot plant Figure 3.17 Correlation analysis between fluorescence removal and emerging contaminants removal during AOP process Table 3.6. Observed correlations between removal of fluorescence signal and organic micropollutants during AOP process Case Study 6 (Karmiel, Israel) - Recovery of high-value products from olive mill wastewater Figure 6.1 Polyphenols concentration of the raw OMW and the OMW after the different adsorption runs Figure 6.2 The reuse of methanol for extracting the adsorbed polyphenols on the resin for six successive runs. Figure 6.3 (A) corresponds to the system with 2.5% of OMW mixed with synthetic wastewater, and on (B) corresponds to 2.5% of treated OMW by the resin bed. Figure 6.4 a) the effect of extraction of polyphenol from OMW othe methane yield of the the mixed OMW with domestic WW. (b) the effect of polyphenol extraction on its removal by the anaerobic biodegradation. Figure 6.5 Total COD of in and out of the AAT as a result of the extraction process of polyphenol by the resin. Figure 6.6 Soluble COD of in and out of the AAT as a result of the extraction process of polyphenol by the resin. Figure 6.7 The effect of polyphenol extraction on the removal of polyphenol after the anaerobic (AAT) treatment Figure 6.8 The effect of polyphenol extraction on the biogas rate Figure 6.9 The effect of polyphenol extraction on the average biogas production rate. Case Study 7 (Tain, UK) - Recovery of nutrients from distillery wastewater after AnMBR treatment in Tain Figure 7.1 Examples of X-ray diffraction spectra of the products recovered at pHs of (a) 7.4, (b) 7.7, (c) 8.1 and (d) 8.9. Table 7.1 Metals and COD content of the products recovered at different pHs as % mass. Figure 7.2 Impact of pH on the performance of the ammonia stripping unit. Figure 7.3 Impact of N/metal ratio on ammonia stripping efficiency (lab-scale trials with synthetic solutions) Figure 7.4 Evolution of the ammonia concentration over time for an example of a single batch of the acid solution in the scrubber. Case Study 8 (Roussillon, France) - Recovery of sulphur at the Chemical Platform Roussillon Table 8.1: Testing conditions Table 8.2: Typical ranges for operating parameters during the pilot tests Figure 8.1: Results obtained in the evolution of SO2 content between each operation unit of the pilot Table 8.3: Best results obtained in the pilot. Figure 8.2: Evolution of metals in the NaHSO3 solution Figure 8.3: Evolution of halogens in the NaHSO3 solution Figure 8.4: Adsorption efficiency obtained during lab tests at different temperatures Figure 8.5: Adsorption efficiency of the pilot at different pH Figure 8.5: Adsorption yield results of the pilot modelling, comparison with experimental results Case Study 8 (Roussillon, France) - Recovery of metals Table 8.4: description of the ion exchange resins tested Figure 8.6: Results on 10-fold diluted effluent for resin A Table 8.5: Results on 10-fold diluted effluent for resin A Figure 8.7: Comparison of results for a 10-fold and 5-fold diluted effluent for resin A Table 8.6: Results on 5-fold diluted effluent for resin A Figure 8.8: Comparison of results for 10-, 5- and 3-fold diluted effluent for resin A Figure 8.9: Comparison of results on resin A with and without preconditioning Table 8.7: Results with and without conditioning for resin A Figure 8.10: Influence of the resin A quantity / effluent quantity ratio on molybdenum absorption efficiency for 3-fold diluted effluent Figure 8.11: Comparison of results obtained on different resins Table 8.8: Results of elution lab tests Table 8.9: Results of lifetime lab tests Case Study 9 (Kalundborg, Denmark) - I2.9. Concept study for nutrient and/or high-value product recovery in Kalund Table 9.1: No. of samples, mean, median, min, max and variance of various parameters in the concentrate of the NF-RO scheme in CS9 measured by the iWWTP Table 9.2: Influent loads within the iWWTP (industrial waste water treatment plant), the conc. (concentrate under study), ratio of concentrate in total load, potential recovery rate in concentrate and related to iWWTP influent本数据集收录了支撑ULTIMATE交付件1.5所述实验结论的全部相关数据。该交付件可在Zenodo平台通过DOI链接https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14967803获取。本数据集涉及以下研究内容： ### 案例研究3（意大利罗西尼亚诺）：采用本地工业副产物开展罗西尼亚诺地区废水处理 表3.1 吸附柱设计参数 图3.1 高级氧化工艺（Advanced Oxidation Process, AOP）中试装置剂量曲线 表3.2 实验室试验期间的硬度与化学需氧量（Chemical Oxygen Demand, COD）去除效果 图3.2 进水与出水的电导率数值 图3.3 进水与出水的pH值 图3.4 进水与出水的碱度数值 图3.5 进水与出水中碳酸根（CO₃²⁻）浓度数值 图3.6 进水与出水中碳酸氢根（HCO₃⁻）浓度数值 图3.7 进水与出水中氢氧根（OH⁻）浓度数值 图3.8 暂时硬度与永久硬度去除效果 图3.9 硬度去除效率 表3.3 采用从铝污泥中回收的混凝剂溶液开展烧杯试验（Jar Test）的结果 表3.4 所用活性炭的基本特性 图3.10 吸附试验1期间实时传感器测得的UV₂₅₄与荧光信号穿透曲线 图3.11 吸附试验2期间实时传感器测得的UV₂₅₄与荧光信号穿透曲线 图3.12 两次吸附试验期间卡马西平与扑米酮的浓度变化曲线 表3.5 光谱传感器信号与监测的新兴污染物之间的相关性观测结果 图3.13 吸附试验2期间磺胺甲恶唑与荧光信号的相关性观测结果。其中C₀与F₀分别为进水污染物实测浓度与荧光信号初始值 图3.14 不同时段采集的AOP中试装置进水废水荧光光谱 图3.15 实时记录的AOP中试装置进水与出水荧光信号 图3.16 AOP中试装置进水（蓝色标识）与出水（橙色标识）中扑米酮与克拉霉素的实测浓度 图3.17 AOP工艺期间荧光去除率与新兴污染物去除率的相关性分析 表3.6 AOP工艺期间荧光信号去除率与有机微污染物去除率的观测相关性 ### 案例研究6（以色列卡尔米埃尔）：从橄榄磨坊废水（Olive Mill Wastewater, OMW）中回收高价值产物 图6.1 原OMW与经不同吸附工序处理后的OMW中多酚浓度 图6.2 甲醇重复用于洗脱树脂上吸附的多酚，连续6次循环的洗脱效果 图6.3 (A)为将2.5% OMW与合成废水混合的体系，(B)为经树脂床处理后的2.5% OMW体系 图6.4 (a) 从OMW中提取多酚对混合OMW与生活污水的甲烷产率的影响；(b) 多酚提取对厌氧生物降解去除多酚的影响 图6.5 经树脂提取多酚工艺后，总厌氧处理（AAT）单元进出水的总COD数值 图6.6 经树脂提取多酚工艺后，AAT单元进出水的可溶性COD数值 图6.7 多酚提取对厌氧处理后多酚去除效果的影响 图6.8 多酚提取对沼气产率的影响 图6.9 多酚提取对平均沼气产率的影响 ### 案例研究7（英国泰恩）：经厌氧膜生物反应器（Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor, AnMBR）处理后，从泰恩地区酿酒厂废水中回收营养物 图7.1 不同pH下回收产物的X射线衍射（X-ray Diffraction, XRD）谱图示例：(a) 7.4、(b) 7.7、(c) 8.1 及 (d) 8.9 表7.1 不同pH下回收产物的金属与COD含量（以质量百分比计） 图7.2 pH对氨吹脱单元运行性能的影响 图7.3 N/金属比对氨吹脱效率的影响（合成溶液实验室规模试验） 图7.4 洗涤塔中单批次酸溶液的氨浓度随时间变化曲线 ### 案例研究8（法国鲁西永）：鲁西永化工平台硫回收 表8.1 试验工况 表8.2 中试试验期间运行参数的典型范围 图8.1 中试各操作单元之间SO₂含量的变化结果 表8.3 中试试验获得的最优结果 图8.2 亚硫酸氢钠（NaHSO₃）溶液中金属含量的变化 图8.3 亚硫酸氢钠溶液中卤素含量的变化 图8.4 不同温度下实验室试验测得的吸附效率 图8.5 不同pH下中试装置的吸附效率 图8.6 中试模型吸附产率结果与试验结果对比 ### 案例研究8（法国鲁西永）：金属回收 表8.4 受试离子交换树脂概况 图8.6 树脂A对10倍稀释废水的试验结果 表8.5 树脂A对10倍稀释废水的试验结果 图8.7 树脂A对10倍与5倍稀释废水的试验结果对比 表8.6 树脂A对5倍稀释废水的试验结果 图8.8 树脂A对10倍、5倍及3倍稀释废水的试验结果对比 图8.9 树脂A经预处理与未经预处理的试验结果对比 表8.7 树脂A经预处理与未经预处理的试验结果 图8.10 树脂A投加量/废水体积比对3倍稀释废水中钼吸附效率的影响 图8.11 不同树脂的试验结果对比 表8.8 洗脱实验室试验结果 表8.9 使用寿命实验室试验结果 ### 案例研究9（丹麦卡伦堡）：卡伦堡地区营养物与/或高价值产物回收概念研究 表9.1 由工业污水处理厂（industrial wastewater treatment plant, iWWTP）测得的案例9中纳滤-反渗透（Nanofiltration-Reverse Osmosis, NF-RO）工艺浓缩液各参数的样本量、均值、中位数、最小值、最大值与方差 表9.2 工业污水处理厂进水负荷、研究中的浓缩液、浓缩液占总负荷的比例、浓缩液中潜在回收率以及对应污水处理厂进水的相关参数