Tecnologia educacional sobre Neuropatias para pessoas que vivem com Diabetes Mellitus: Estudo de validação.

Introduction: The provision of care to patients with Diabetes and Neuropathy must be based on health education. Educational technologies are facilitating means in this context, being essential, after their construction, the evaluation stage, for improvement and analysis of the educational product.Objective: To evaluate, through the judgment of specialists and the target audience, an educational technology in booklet format on Neuropathies for people with Diabetes Mellitus. Methodology: Educational technology evaluation study, with interface in methodological development, with a quantitative approach, divided into two stages: Content and Appearance Evaluation, carried out in 2024, and Semantic Evaluation, carried out in 2025. Fifteen health specialists, nine experts in the didactic-illustrative field, and eighteen patients with diabetic neuropathies from a specialty center participated. For data collection, questionnaires were used, interpreted through the Content Index, Summative Score of the adapted Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) instrument, and Semantic Index. Results: The overall Content Index was 0.91, and the Appearance evaluation obtained a score higher than 10 points in SAM. The booklet was improved following the specialists’ suggestions for version II. The overall Semantic Index was 0.98. The suggestions from the target audience served to improve the booklet for the final version. Final Considerations: The booklet was evaluated to be used as an educational technology for people with Diabetes Mellitus.引言：针对糖尿病（Diabetes Mellitus）合并神经病变（Neuropathies）患者的照护工作，必须以健康教育为核心支撑。教育技术是该场景下的重要辅助干预手段，而在其研发完成后，评估环节对于该教育产品的优化与分析具有不可替代的关键作用。 研究目的：联合专科医师与目标受众的评价意见，对一款面向糖尿病患者的神经病变教育手册类教育技术产品开展系统性评估。 研究方法：本研究为教育技术评估类科研项目，采用定量研究方法结合方法学开发框架，划分为两个实施阶段：2024年开展的内容与外观评价，以及2025年开展的语义评价。共纳入15名健康照护专科医师、9名教学插画领域专家，以及来自某专科诊疗中心的18名糖尿病神经病变患者参与研究。数据收集采用问卷调查方式，通过内容指数（Content Index）、经改编的材料适宜性评估（Suitability Assessment of Materials, SAM）量表总得分，以及语义指数（Semantic Index）对采集数据进行统计解读与分析。 研究结果：整体内容指数得分为0.91，外观评价在SAM量表中得分高于10分。依据专科医师提出的修改建议，该手册完成了第二版优化升级。整体语义指数得分为0.98，目标受众反馈的修改意见进一步推动该手册形成终版定稿。 研究结论：本评估结果证实，该教育手册可作为面向糖尿病患者的教育技术产品投入使用。