2642|DEBATE ON THE STATE OF THE NATION (XVIII)

— Knowledge of the holding of the debate on the state of the nation. — Opinion on the degree of interest these debates have for people. — Opinion on whether these debates deal with the issues that really concern Spaniards today. — Opinion on the usefulness of these parliamentary debates. — Frequency of political information by different media. — Media, television or radio, which has followed the development of the debate. Reason why he has not followed the debate, if any. — Degree of interest in the follow-up to the debate. — Main topics that have been discussed in the debate. — Opinion on the extent to which issues that concern Spaniards have been discussed in the debate. — Opinion on the degree of conflict of the debate. — Evaluation of the interventions in the debate of different political leaders. — Degree of agreement with the statements of: José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, Mariano Rajoy, Josep Antoni Duran i Lleida, Joan Puigcercós, Josu Erkoreka, Gaspar Llamazares, Joan Herrera, Paulino Rivero, Francisco Rodríguez, José Antonio Labordeta, Begoña Lasagabaster, Uxue Barkos, Alfredo Pérez Rubalcaba. — Opinion on the degree to which the President of the Government, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has transmitted to Spanish society confidence in the economic and political future, decision to fulfill the electoral promises and strength of the Government and firmness of its decisions. — Opinion on the degree to which Mariano Rajoy has transmitted to Spanish society the message that the PP has real proposals against government policy, is capable of constructive opposition, is capable of instilling trust in Spanish society and is prepared to assume the government of the country. — Opinion on whether José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and Mariano Rajoy demonstrated in the debate: knowledge and sensitivity to the country’s problems, moderation, practicality, ability to communicate with street people, ability to fit criticism and political initiative. — Opinion on which politician has won the debate. — Evolution of the image of political leaders after the debate. — Opinion on developments in the political and economic situation after the debate. — Scale of political ideology of the interviewee. — Remembrance of vote in the general elections of March 2004.—— 对国情辩论举办情况的知晓程度 —— 对该类辩论受民众关注程度的评价 —— 对该类辩论是否涉及西班牙民众当下真正关切议题的评价 —— 对议会辩论实用性的评价 —— 受访者通过各类媒体获取政治资讯的频率 —— 受访者追踪辩论进展所使用的媒体类型（电视或广播），以及未追踪辩论的原因（如存在） —— 对追踪该辩论的关注程度 —— 辩论中涉及的主要议题 —— 对辩论中西班牙民众关切议题的讨论充分程度的评价 —— 对本次辩论冲突程度的评价 —— 对不同政治领袖在辩论中的发言表现的评价 —— 对以下政治人物发言表态的认同程度：何塞·路易斯·罗德里格斯·萨帕特罗（José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero）、马里亚诺·拉霍伊（Mariano Rajoy）、何塞普·安东尼·杜兰·伊·列伊达（Josep Antoni Duran i Lleida）、琼·普伊格塞尔斯（Joan Puigcercós）、霍苏·埃尔科雷卡（Josu Erkoreka）、加斯帕尔·亚马萨雷斯（Gaspar Llamazares）、琼·埃雷拉（Joan Herrera）、保利诺·里韦罗（Paulino Rivero）、弗朗西斯科·罗德里格斯（Francisco Rodríguez）、何塞·安东尼奥·拉博尔代塔（José Antonio Labordeta）、贝戈尼亚·拉萨加巴斯泰尔（Begoña Lasagabaster）、乌克斯·巴科斯（Uxue Barkos）、阿尔弗雷多·佩雷斯·鲁瓦尔卡瓦（Alfredo Pérez Rubalcaba） —— 对西班牙政府首相何塞·路易斯·罗德里格斯·萨帕特罗（José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero）向西班牙社会传递出的以下观感的评价：对经济与政治未来的信心、兑现选举承诺的决心、政府的执政力度及其决策的坚定性 —— 对马里亚诺·拉霍伊（Mariano Rajoy）向西班牙社会传递的以下观感的评价：人民党（PP）拥有对抗现任政府政策的切实提案、具备开展建设性反对的能力、能够赢得西班牙社会的信任、并有能力承担国家执政职责 —— 对何塞·路易斯·罗德里格斯·萨帕特罗与马里亚诺·拉霍伊在辩论中是否展现出以下特质的评价：对国家问题的认知与敏感度、行事克制、务实作风、与普通民众沟通的能力、应对批评的能力以及政治主动性 —— 对哪位政治领袖在本次辩论中胜出的评价 —— 辩论后政治领袖公众形象的变化情况 —— 对辩论后该国政治与经济局势发展的评价 —— 受访者的政治意识形态立场倾向 —— 对2004年3月大选投票情况的回忆