Oxford House Recovery Home Data Over Time

Methods
Data are provided from 627 residents of Oxford Houses, which are a network of self-run recovery homes. Data were collected in a longitudinal study that occurred over a two-year period. When participants entered the recovery homes, they completed the baseline interview. Every four months, participants were interviewed for as long as they lived in these recovery homes.

Baseline Measures
We provide the following surveys that were taken at the first baseline session participants completed: the demographic Survey; the Addiction Severity Index (Mclellan et al. 1992); the Form 90 (Miller, 1996); the Drug Taking Confidence Questionnaire (Annis & Graham, 1988); the Psychological Sense of Community Scale (Jason, Stevens, & Ram, 2015); the Perceived Stress Scale-Brief Version (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983); the AA Affiliation instrument (Humphreys, Kaskutas, & Weisner, 1998); the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965); the Important People Inventory; the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Brief Version (WHOQOL Group, 1998); the Snyder State Hope Scale (Snyder et al., 1996; Stevens, Buchannan, Ferrari, Jason, & Ram, 2014); the BFl-10 Personality Scale (Rammstedt, & John, 2007); and the Recovery Home Processes Questionnaire (included in interviews with the house presidents only).

Repeated Measures
Following the baseline wave, similar measures were administered. At these waves, we used the Addiction Severity Index-Lite (Only the Employment/Support Status, Alcohol/Drugs, and Legal Status sections).

Outcome Variable
We found a single latent outcome factor fitting the data, or a recovery factor behavior variable. Recovery factors across waves are located in the dataset (“recoveryfactor.1”; “recoveryfactor.2”; etc.). For details related to outcome variables and the original authors’ finding of a single latent recovery factor, see: Jason, L.A., Guerrero, M., Salomon-Amend, M., Stevens, E., Light, J.M. and Stoolmiller, M. (2021), Context Matters: Home-level But Not Individual-Level Recovery Social Capital Predicts Residents’ Relapse. Am J Community Psychol, 67: 392-404. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12481

Datasets
Some subscales or specific questions have been removed from the dataset for deidentification purposes. Reference “Data Dictionary Codebook” for names, labels, and attributes of variables, and “Baseline Interview” (in “Interviews” folder) for a copy of the survey instrument distributed to participants at baseline.

研究方法
本数据集的数据来自627名牛津康复之家（Oxford Houses）的居住者，该机构是一个自助运营的康复家园网络。数据采集自一项为期两年的纵向研究：参与者入住康复家园时完成基线访谈；在入住期间，每四个月接受一次随访访谈。

基线测量工具
本数据集提供了参与者首次完成基线访谈时填写的以下问卷：人口学问卷；成瘾严重程度指数（Addiction Severity Index，Mclellan等，1992）；Form 90量表（Miller，1996）；服药信心问卷（Drug Taking Confidence Questionnaire，Annis & Graham，1988）；社区心理感知量表（Psychological Sense of Community Scale，Jason, Stevens, & Ram，2015）；简版知觉压力量表（Perceived Stress Scale-Brief Version，Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein，1983）；匿名戒酒互助会（AA）归属感量表（AA Affiliation instrument，Humphreys, Kaskutas, & Weisner，1998）；罗森伯格自尊量表（Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale，Rosenberg，1965）；重要他人量表（Important People Inventory）；世界卫生组织简版生活质量评估量表（World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Brief Version，WHOQOL Group，1998）；斯奈德状态希望量表（Snyder State Hope Scale，Snyder等，1996；Stevens, Buchannan, Ferrari, Jason, & Ram，2014）；BFl-10人格量表（BFl-10 Personality Scale，Rammstedt, & John，2007）；以及康复家园流程问卷（仅向家园负责人发放访谈）。

重复测量工具
基线访谈之后，采用了相似的测量工具。在各随访波次中，仅使用成瘾严重程度指数简版（Addiction Severity Index-Lite）中的就业/支持状况、酒精/药物使用及法律状况三个模块。

结果变量
本数据集适配出单一潜在结果因子，即康复行为因子。各随访波次的康复因子数据均收录于数据集中，命名格式为"recoveryfactor.1"、"recoveryfactor.2"等。关于结果变量及原作者发现单一潜在康复因子的详细信息，可参阅：Jason, L.A., Guerrero, M., Salomon-Amend, M., Stevens, E., Light, J.M. and Stoolmiller, M. (2021). 情境至关重要：家庭层面而非个体层面的康复社会资本可预测居住者的复吸. 美国社区心理学杂志（Am J Community Psychol）, 67: 392-404. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12481

数据集说明
为保护研究对象的匿名性，部分子量表或特定题目已从数据集中移除。如需了解变量的名称、标签与属性，请参阅《数据字典编码手册》；如需获取基线访谈时发放的问卷原件，请参阅"访谈"文件夹中的"基线访谈"文件。