Replication Data for: \"Equal in Private, Unequal in Public? Coeducation and Sexism in the Soviet Union\"

Despite growing interest in stratified political outcomes, political scientists have paid little attention to desegregation policies. Can coeducation persistently reduce sexism, equalizing gender roles across the private and public spheres? In 1954, the Soviet Union desegregated compulsory education throughout all urban areas. This desegregation yielded substantial effects that persisted over time and were uniform across attitudes and behaviors but not generalizable across social spheres. Differences-in-discontinuity estimates suggest that coeducation decreased sexist attitudes towards gender roles in the private sphere (household roles) but not in the public sphere (leadership roles) relative to comparable cohorts in comparable but unaffected rural areas in the Soviet Union. Our findings suggest that desegregation’s potential to reduce sexism is limited to proximate social roles affected through direct socialization, but falters in distant public roles, where change requires indirect pathways and institutional support largely absent in our context.尽管学界对分层政治结果的研究兴趣与日俱增，但政治学者对性别融合教育政策的关注却寥寥无几。男女同校教育能否持续减少性别歧视，进而实现私人与公共领域的性别角色平等？1954年，苏联在全部城市范围内推行义务教育阶段的男女同校改革，即废除了当地的教育性别隔离制度。此项改革产生了显著且长期持续的影响：在个体态度与行为层面呈现出一致性，但并未在不同社会领域间形成普遍可推广的效果。断点双重差分估计结果显示，相较于苏联境内情况相似且未受该政策影响的农村同龄队列群体，男女同校教育降低了私人领域（即家庭角色）中针对性别角色的性别歧视态度，但并未对公共领域（即领导岗位角色）产生类似效果。本研究结果表明，性别融合教育在减少性别歧视方面的作用仅限于通过直接社会化产生影响的邻近社会角色，而在公共领域这类相对疏远的角色中则效果有限——公共领域的角色变革需要间接路径与制度支持，但本研究的研究场景中此类支持基本缺失。