five

Data from: Can social partnerships influence the microbiome? insights from ant farmers and their trophobiont mutualists.

收藏
DataONE2018-01-22 更新2024-06-25 收录
下载链接:
https://search.dataone.org/view/null
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Mutualistic interactions with microbes have played a crucial role in the evolution and ecology of animal hosts. However, it is unclear what factors are most important in influencing particular host-microbe associations. While closely related animal species may have more similar microbiota than distantly related ones due to phylogenetic contingencies, social partnerships with other organisms, such as those in which one animal farms another, may also influence an organism’s symbiotic microbiome. We studied a mutualistic network of Brachymyrmex and Lasius ants farming several honeydew-producing Prociphilus aphids and Rhizoecus mealybugs to test whether the mutualistic microbiomes of these interacting insects are primarily correlated with their phylogeny or with their shared social partnerships. Our results confirm a phylogenetic signal in the microbiomes of aphid and mealybug trophobionts, with each species harboring species-specific endosymbiont strains of Buchnera (aphids), Tremblaya and Sodalis (mealybugs), and Serratia (both mealybugs and aphids) despite being farmed by the same ants. This is likely explained by strict vertical transmission of trophobiont endosymbionts between generations. In contrast, the ants’ microbiome is potentially shaped by their social partnerships, with ants that farm the same trophobionts also sharing strains of sugar-processing Acetobacteraceae bacteria, known from other honeydew-feeding ants and which likely reside extracellularly in the ants’ guts. These ant-microbe associations are arguably more ‘open’ and subject to horizontal transmission or social transmission within ant colonies. These findings suggest that the role of social partnerships in shaping a host’s symbiotic microbiome can be variable, and is likely dependent on how the microbes are transmitted across generations.

微生物与动物宿主间的互利共生相互作用,在动物宿主的演化与生态学进程中扮演了至关重要的角色。然而,目前学界仍未明确,哪些因素对特定宿主-微生物共生关联的影响最为显著。尽管由于系统发育偶然性,亲缘关系较近的动物物种的微生物组往往比远缘类群更为相似,但与其他生物形成的社会伙伴关系——例如某一动物饲养另一生物的共生模式——同样可能影响宿主的共生微生物组。 本研究以短角狂蚁属(Brachymyrmex)与毛蚁属(Lasius)构建的互利共生网络为研究体系,该类蚂蚁会饲养多种产蜜露的卷毛蚜属(Prociphilus)蚜虫与根粉蚧属(Rhizoecus)粉蚧。我们通过该体系开展实验,旨在验证这些互作昆虫的共生微生物组,究竟主要与其系统发育相关,还是与其共享的社会伙伴关系相关。 研究结果证实,蚜虫与粉蚧的食蜜共生体微生物组存在系统发育信号:尽管均由同一类蚂蚁饲养,但各宿主物种分别携带物种特异性的内共生菌株——蚜虫体内为布赫纳菌属(Buchnera),粉蚧体内为特雷布拉亚菌属(Tremblaya)与索氏菌属(Sodalis),而沙雷菌属(Serratia)则同时存在于粉蚧与蚜虫体内。这一现象大概率可通过食蜜共生体内共生菌的代际严格垂直传播得到解释。 与之形成鲜明对比的是,蚂蚁的微生物组更易受其社会伙伴关系的塑造:饲养相同食蜜共生体的蚂蚁,会共享一类参与糖代谢的醋酸杆菌科(Acetobacteraceae)细菌菌株。这类细菌已在其他取食蜜露的蚂蚁类群中被报道,且大概率定居于蚂蚁肠道的细胞外区域。这些蚂蚁-微生物共生关联可以说更为‘开放’,易受蚁群内部的水平传播或社会传播影响。 本研究结果表明,社会伙伴关系在塑造宿主共生微生物组中的作用存在差异,这很可能取决于微生物跨代传播的具体方式。
创建时间:
2018-01-22
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务