Dysfunctional Parent Modes & Self-Compassion SJU (Feb 2026)

Datafile is in SPSS format. Participants are 384 racially diverse undergraduate college students from New York City. Includes demographic data. Includes item scores and total scale scores of variables measuring Dysfunctional Parent Modes (Demanding and Punitive), Self-compassion, Emotional Distress, Subjective Well-being, Social Support, and Dysfunctional Attitudes. What follows includes more details on the assessment materials we used. Measures. Dysfunctional parent modes were assessed using the punitive and demanding parent subscale of the Schema Mode Inventory Short Form (SMI; Lobbestael et al., 2010). This subscale is comprised of 17 items. Response options range from 1 (never) to 6 (always). Dysfunctional parent mode scores were calculated by summing all 17 items. Higher scores indicate higher levels of dysfunctional punitive and demanding parent modes. Self-compassion was measured with the 12-item Self-Compassion Scale–Short Form (SCS-SF; Raes et al., 2011), that assesses how compassionate people are toward themselves regarding their imperfections. Item response options range from 0 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Scores are calculated by adding together all item responses. Higher scores represent higher levels of self-compassion. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS; Zimet, Dahlem, Zimet, & Farley, 1988) is a 12-item scale measuring perception of the availability and adequacy of support from family, friends, and significant others. Item response options range from 1 (very strongly disagree) to 7 (very strongly agree). Scores are calculated by summing all 12 items. Higher scores represent higher perceived social support. Dysfunctional attitudes were assessed with the 9-item Dysfunctional Attitude Scale-Short Form-1 (DAS-SF1; Beevers et al., 2007), which measures maladaptive beliefs and attitudes about perfectionism, need for approval, and life imperatives. Item response options range from 1 (totally disagree) to 4 (totally agree). Scores are calculated by summing responses to all items, and higher scores represent higher levels of dysfunctional attitudes. The 16-item College Student Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire (CSSWQ; Renshaw, 2018) was used to assess subjective well-being. Item response options range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Scores are calculated by summing responses to all items. Higher scores reflect higher subjective well-being. Emotional distress was measured with the 8-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Emotional Distress Scale - Depression Short Form (PROMIS-EDS; Schalet et al., 2016). Items inquire about worthlessness, helplessness, sadness, and hopelessness. Item response options range from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Scores are calculated by summing responses to all items. Higher scores reflect greater levels of depressive-like emotional distress. This data also contains participants responses to the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). Some clinical history included. Some data on parents is included. Reported history of Adverse Childhood Events and Traumatic experiences is also included.

本数据集文件采用SPSS格式。研究对象为来自纽约市的384名种族多元的本科在校大学生。数据集包含人口统计学数据，涵盖用于评估功能失调父母模式（苛求与惩罚性）、自我同情、情绪困扰、主观幸福感、社会支持以及功能失调性态度的变量的项目得分与总量表得分。下文将详述本次研究所用的测评材料。测评工具：功能失调父母模式采用图式模式问卷简版（Schema Mode Inventory Short Form, SMI; Lobbestael等，2010）的惩罚性与苛求性父母分量表进行评估，该分量表包含17个条目，条目作答选项分值范围为1（从未）至6（总是）。功能失调父母模式得分通过对全部17个条目得分求和计算得出，得分越高表明惩罚性与苛求性父母模式的程度越严重。自我同情采用12条目自我同情量表简版（Self-Compassion Scale–Short Form, SCS-SF; Raes等，2011）进行测量，该量表用于评估个体面对自身不完美时的自我同情程度，条目作答选项分值范围为0（几乎从不）至5（几乎总是），得分通过对全部条目作答得分求和计算得出，得分越高表明自我同情水平越高。领悟社会支持多维量表（Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, MSPSS; Zimet, Dahlem, Zimet & Farley, 1988）为12条目量表，用于测量个体感知到的来自家人、朋友及重要他人所提供的支持的可获得性与充足性，条目作答选项分值范围为1（非常强烈反对）至7（非常强烈同意），得分通过对全部12个条目得分求和计算得出，得分越高表明感知到的社会支持水平越高。功能失调性态度采用9条目功能失调态度量表简版1（Dysfunctional Attitude Scale-Short Form-1, DAS-SF1; Beevers等，2007）进行评估，该量表用于评估个体在完美主义、寻求认可需求以及人生必须之事的适应不良信念与态度，条目作答选项分值范围为1（完全不同意）至4（完全同意），得分通过对全部条目作答得分求和计算得出，得分越高表明功能失调性态度水平越高。采用16条目大学生主观幸福感问卷（College Student Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire, CSSWQ; Renshaw, 2018）用于评估主观幸福感，条目作答选项分值范围为1（非常不同意）至7（非常同意），得分通过对全部条目作答得分求和计算得出，得分越高表明主观幸福感水平越高。情绪困扰采用8条目患者报告结局测量信息系统情绪困扰量表-抑郁简版（Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Emotional Distress Scale - Depression Short Form, PROMIS-EDS; Schalet等，2016）进行测量，条目涉及无价值感、无助感、悲伤及绝望感，条目作答选项分值范围为1（从未）至5（总是），得分通过对全部条目作答得分求和计算得出，得分越高表明抑郁样情绪困扰程度越高。本数据集还包含参与者在十项人格量表（Ten Item Personality Inventory, TIPI）的作答结果，同时包含部分临床史数据、父母相关信息，以及参与者报告的不良童年经历与创伤经历史。