five

Performance comparison of PROSPER with PoPS and SitePrediction for predicting cleavage sites for selected enzymes.

收藏
Figshare2012-11-29 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Performance_comparison_of_PROSPER_with_PoPS_and_SitePrediction_for_predicting_cleavage_sites_for_selected_enzymes_/206192
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
a“-” denotes that the prediction result at this specificity level is not available by this tool.Specificity (Sp) levels were set as close as possible to one another among the different tools. For PROSPER, 5-fold cross-validation ± feature selection and self-consistency tests were performed to compare to PoPS and SitePrediction. The 3 different types of PROSPER models built are named PROSPER5CV, PROSPERselect and PROSPERSelf, respectively. Sensitivity (Sn) values at different Sp levels were compared. The best prediction performance at each Specificity level is highlighted in bold.
创建时间:
2012-11-29
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作