Performance comparison of PROSPER with PoPS and SitePrediction for predicting cleavage sites for selected enzymes.
收藏Figshare2012-11-29 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Performance_comparison_of_PROSPER_with_PoPS_and_SitePrediction_for_predicting_cleavage_sites_for_selected_enzymes_/206192
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
a“-” denotes that the prediction result at this specificity level is not available by this tool.Specificity (Sp) levels were set as close as possible to one another among the different tools. For PROSPER, 5-fold cross-validation ± feature selection and self-consistency tests were performed to compare to PoPS and SitePrediction. The 3 different types of PROSPER models built are named PROSPER5CV, PROSPERselect and PROSPERSelf, respectively. Sensitivity (Sn) values at different Sp levels were compared. The best prediction performance at each Specificity level is highlighted in bold.
创建时间:
2012-11-29



