Significant differences in lameness and limb-related abnormalities between Baseline and Final examinations of 149 working horses belonging to 131 owners from Jaipur, India.

(Participatory intervention group n = 83 horses belonging to 73 people; Control group n = 66 horses belonging to 58 people). The group with the largest relative improvement between Baseline and Final has the text depicting the magnitude of change in bold.1 See Table 1 for scoring methods2 For continuous or ordinal data = mean of horses (for whole horse measures) or limbs (for limb-specific measures) affected. For binary measures or those aggregated into two groups for analysis = percentage of horses/ limbs affected3 Relative improvement: the group which showed the most positive clinical change and/or the least negative clinical change (except for 'Shod' and 'Active response when approached' where no clinical value was applied)4 Calculated as Year 1—Year 3, i.e. a positive value = clinical improvement; a negative value = deterioration (except for 'Shod' and 'Active response when approached' where no clinical value was applied)5 1st-order MQL estimation (otherwise, less-biased 2nd-order PQL estimation was employed in all binary and multinomial response models)Significant differences in lameness and limb-related abnormalities between Baseline and Final examinations of 149 working horses belonging to 131 owners from Jaipur, India.