five

G-CSF + plerixafor versus G-CSF alone mobilized hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

收藏
DataCite Commons2024-12-03 更新2024-08-19 收录
下载链接:
https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/G-CSF_plerixafor_versus_G-CSF_alone_mobilized_hematopoietic_stem_cells_in_patients_with_multiple_myeloma_and_lymphoma_a_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis/25395299
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
The combination of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor is one of the approaches for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), and Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the ability of G-CSF + plerixafor to mobilize peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells and examine its safety profile. We performed a database search using the terms ‘granulocyte colony stimulating factor’, ‘G-CSF’, ‘AMD3100’, and ‘plerixafor’, published up to May 1, 2023. The methodology is described in further detail in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023425760). Twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. G-CSF + plerixafor resulted in more patients achieving the predetermined apheresis yield of CD34+ cells than G-CSF alone (OR, 5.33; 95%, 4.34–6.55). It was further discovered that G-CSF + plerixafor could mobilize more CD34+ cells into PB, which was beneficial for the next transplantation in both randomized controlled (MD, 18.30; 95%, 8.74–27.85) and single-arm (MD, 20.67; 95%, 14.34–27.00) trials. Furthermore, G-CSF + plerixafor did not cause more treatment emergent adverse events than G-CSF alone (OR, 1.25; 95%, 0.87–1.80). This study suggests that the combination of G-CSF and plerixafor, resulted in more patients with MM, NHL, and HL, achieving the predetermined apheresis yield of CD34+ cells, which is related to the more effective mobilization of CD34+ cells into PB.
提供机构:
Taylor & Francis
创建时间:
2024-03-12
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务