Power and Interest scores for stakeholders in research data management

To estimate the power and interest of each stakeholder group, a survey was conducted among RDM professionals, including data stewards, data managers, and librarians. Respondents were asked to rate the power and interest of various stakeholder groups on a scale from 0 (low) to 10 (high). A total of 95 responses were collected (Thanks for participating!), with 45 participants providing complete ratings for all 14 stakeholder groups (the dataset is available for reference). The survey participants were primarily recruited through national RDM networks, mailing lists, and professional community meetings, with the majority being RDM professionals affiliated with German academic institutions. However, a small number of respondents from other European institutions also contributed, offering additional perspectives from the broader European research landscape. The sample draws from a broad and diverse cross-section of practitioners across institutional roles and contexts, providing valuable insights into RDM engagement. For compliance and data protection reasons, and to avoid any administrative delays, the survey focused solely on rating the power and interest of stakeholders; no personally identifying or demographic data—such as age, institutional affiliation, discipline, or organizational unit—were collected from participants.为评估各利益相关方群体的影响力与关注度，本研究面向研究数据管理（Research Data Management，RDM）从业者开展了一项调研，受访对象涵盖数据专员（data stewards）、数据管理员及图书馆员。受访者需基于0（低）至10（高）的评分量表，对各类利益相关方群体的影响力与关注度进行打分。本次调研共回收95份反馈，谨此感谢所有参与者的支持！其中45名参与者完成了全部14个利益相关方群体的完整评分，本数据集可供参考查阅。调研参与者主要通过国家级RDM网络、邮件列表及专业学术社区会议招募，其中多数为隶属于德国学术机构的RDM从业者，同时也有少量来自欧洲其他地区机构的受访者，为更广泛的欧洲科研生态提供了多元视角。本次样本涵盖了不同机构角色与场景下的从业者群体，覆盖范围广泛且具有多样性，为研究数据管理领域的参与情况提供了极具价值的洞察。出于合规性与数据保护要求，同时避免行政流程延误，本次调研仅聚焦于利益相关方的影响力与关注度评分，未收集任何可识别个人身份的信息或人口统计数据，例如年龄、所属机构、研究领域或组织部门等。