Classification of majority opinions and headnotes written by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

This is data to accompany an article by Linda L. Berger and Eric C. Nystrom, "A Rhetorical-Computational Analysis of Justice Antonin Scalia's 'Remarkable Influence': The Unexpected Importance of Deceptively Unanimous and Contested Majority Opinions," <em>Journal of Appellate Practice and Process</em> 20, no. 2 (2020). In "scalia-HN-with-ruletype.tsv," Berger classified each headnote from a Scalia-authored majority opinion as one of the following rhetorical types: argument, scalia rule, or preexisting rule. (See article for further explanation of these categories.) Organized by SCDB ID and headnote number. In "unanimity.tsv," Berger addressed each case with a Scalia-authored majority opinion, assessing the degree of unanimity, which may or may not be the same as that implied by the for/against vote in the case. Fields include case SCDB ID, majority-minority vote, and degree of unanimity. Both data files are in Tab-separated format. For further information, please contact the authors.本数据集配套于Linda L. Berger与Eric C. Nystrom发表于《Journal of Appellate Practice and Process》2020年第20卷第2期的论文《A Rhetorical-Computational Analysis of Justice Antonin Scalia's 'Remarkable Influence': The Unexpected Importance of Deceptively Unanimous and Contested Majority Opinions》。在`scalia-HN-with-ruletype.tsv`文件中，Berger将安东宁·斯卡利亚大法官撰写的多数判决意见书的每一条案件提要（headnote）划分为以下三类修辞类型：论证型（argument）、斯卡利亚规则型（scalia rule）与既存规则型（preexisting rule）。有关上述类别的详细阐释，请参见配套论文。该数据集按SCDB编号（SCDB ID）与案件提要编号进行组织。在`unanimity.tsv`文件中，Berger针对所有由斯卡利亚大法官撰写多数判决意见书的案件，评估其判决一致程度——该一致程度可能与案件中赞成与反对票所体现的一致程度相同，也可能不同。该文件包含以下字段：SCDB编号、多数票-少数票比例、判决一致程度。两个数据文件均采用制表符分隔格式（Tab-separated format）。如需进一步相关信息，请联系本文作者。