Integration of the Ash-Based Treatment of the Anerobic Digestate in a Wider Valorization Process by Aspen Plus® Simulation

Spreadsheets for the 7 scenarios investigated in the article: "Aspen Plus® process simulation model of the biomass ash-based treatment of anaerobic digestate for production of fertilizer and upgradation of biogas". A comparison of the following 7 process strategies is mentioned in the above article:
Case 1 is the foundation case (labelled as untreated MD) that served as benchmark and it implied the production of MD using the original PSM of Rajendran et al. [11].
In Case 2 a stream of pure hydrochloric acid was incorporated at a 0.1000 times the flowrate of the MD towards the ionization reactor (1HCl:10MD).
In Case 3 a stream of hydrochloric acid was incorpo-rated at 0.1176 times the flowrate of the MD towards the stoichiometric-equilibria reactor (1HCl:8.5MD).
In Case 4 a stream of hydrochloric acid was incorporated at 0.1212 times the flowrate of the MD towards the ionization reactor (1HCl:8.25MD).
The remaining 3 cases are built on Case 3 (i.e. considering the previous acidification of the MD with the dose of 3.18 mEq HCl/g).
In Case 5 the stream of SSA (Table 1) was incorpo-rated at 0.0040 times the flowrate of the MD towards the stoichiometric-equilibria reactor (1SSA:1.76HCl:15MD).
In Case 6 the stream of ash (Table 1) was incorporated at 0.0060 times the flowrate of the MD towards the ionization reactor (1SSA:1.18HCl:10MD).
In Case 7 the stream of ash was incorporated at 0.0080 times the flowrate of the DM to the stoi-chiometric-equilibria reactor (1SSA:0.88HCl:7.5MD).
Additionally, MS Word file summarizes the most relevant data: Table S1, Mass balance of the nutrients monitored in the Aspen Plus® simulations. (1/3); Table S2, Mass balance of the nutrients monitored in the Aspen Plus® simulations. (2/3); Table S3, Mass balance of the nutrients monitored in the Aspen Plus® simulations. (3/3); Table S4, List of the components in the PSM of Rajendran et al. [11]. (1/3); Table S5, List of the components in the PSM of Rajendran et al. [11]. (2/3); Table S6, List of the components in the PSM of Rajendran et al. [11]. (3/3).

本数据集包含论文《基于Aspen Plus®工艺模拟模型的生物质灰基处理厌氧消化液生产肥料并提质沼气》中所研究的7种场景的电子表格。上述论文对比了以下7种工艺方案：
案例1为基准场景（标记为未处理MD），采用Rajendran等人[11]提出的原始工艺模拟模型（Process Simulation Model，简称PSM）生产MD。
案例2中，向电离反应器投加流量为MD进料流量0.1000倍的纯盐酸料流，盐酸与MD的物料配比为1HCl:10MD。
案例3中，向化学计量平衡反应器投加流量为MD进料流量0.1176倍的盐酸料流，盐酸与MD的物料配比为1HCl:8.5MD。
案例4中，向电离反应器投加流量为MD进料流量0.1212倍的盐酸料流，盐酸与MD的物料配比为1HCl:8.25MD。
其余3个案例均基于案例3构建，即采用3.18毫当量HCl每克的投加量对MD进行预酸化。
案例5中，向化学计量平衡反应器投加流量为MD进料流量0.0040倍的硫酸溶液（SSA）料流（源自表1），物料配比为1SSA:1.76HCl:15MD。
案例6中，向电离反应器投加流量为MD进料流量0.0060倍的灰分料流（源自表1），物料配比为1SSA:1.18HCl:10MD。
案例7中，向化学计量平衡反应器投加流量为DM进料流量0.0080倍的灰分料流，物料配比为1SSA:0.88HCl:7.5MD。
此外，配套的Microsoft Word文档汇总了核心相关数据：表S1、Aspen Plus®模拟中监测的营养物质质量平衡（第1/3部分）；表S2、Aspen Plus®模拟中监测的营养物质质量平衡（第2/3部分）；表S3、Aspen Plus®模拟中监测的营养物质质量平衡（第3/3部分）；表S4、Rajendran等人[11]提出的工艺模拟模型（PSM）的组分列表（第1/3部分）；表S5、Rajendran等人[11]提出的工艺模拟模型（PSM）的组分列表（第2/3部分）；表S6、Rajendran等人[11]提出的工艺模拟模型（PSM）的组分列表（第3/3部分）。