Draft data extraction tool.

Across the globe, student champions are building the social prescribing student movement. Given the numerous linkages between social prescribing and students, there is a need to understand the extent and type of evidence on social prescribing and students. Doing so will address an important gap in the literature, as there are no evidence reviews on this topic. Thus, this scoping review aims to understand the extent and type of evidence on social prescribing and students. This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The search strategy will aim to locate both published and unpublished literature. No language or date restrictions will be placed on the search. The databases to be searched include MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), AMED (Ovid), ASSIA (ProQuest), Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest), Global Health (Ovid), Web of Science (Clarivate), Epistemonikos, JBI EBP Database (Ovid), and Cochrane Library. Sources of gray literature to be searched include Google, Google Scholar, Social Care Online (Social Care Institute for Excellence), SIREN Evidence and Resource Library (Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network), and websites of social prescribing organizations and networks. Additionally, a request for evidence sources will be sent out to members of the Global Social Prescribing Student Council. Two independent reviewers will perform title and abstract screening, retrieval and assessment of full-text evidence sources, and data extraction. Data analysis will consist of basic descriptive analysis. Results will be presented in tabular and/or diagrammatic format alongside a narrative summary.全球范围内，学生倡导者正推动社会处方（Social Prescribing）学生运动的发展。鉴于社会处方与学生群体之间存在诸多关联，当前亟需明确有关社会处方与学生的证据覆盖范围及类型。此举将填补该领域的重要研究空白——目前尚无针对该主题的证据综述类研究。因此，本范围综述旨在明确有关社会处方与学生的证据覆盖范围及类型。 本综述将遵循JBI范围综述方法学开展，并按照《系统综述与Meta分析扩展范围综述报告规范》（PRISMA-ScR）进行报告。本次检索策略将兼顾已发表与未发表文献，且检索过程不设语言及时间限制。本次检索将覆盖以下数据库：MEDLINE（Ovid平台）、CINAHL（EBSCO平台）、Embase（Ovid平台）、PsycINFO（Ovid平台）、AMED（Ovid平台）、ASSIA（ProQuest平台）、Sociological Abstracts（ProQuest平台）、Global Health（Ovid平台）、Web of Science（科睿唯安）、Epistemonikos、JBI循证实践数据库（Ovid平台）及Cochrane图书馆。 本次检索还将覆盖以下灰色文献（Gray Literature）来源：谷歌（Google）、谷歌学术（Google Scholar）、社会关怀在线平台（英国社会关怀卓越研究所Social Care Institute for Excellence运营）、SIREN证据与资源库（社会干预研究与评估网络Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network主办）以及各类社会处方相关组织与网络的官方网站。此外，本次研究将向全球社会处方学生委员会成员征集相关证据来源。 将由两名独立审稿人分别完成标题与摘要筛选、全文证据来源的检索与评估以及数据提取工作。数据分析将采用基础描述性分析方法。研究结果将以表格和/或图示形式呈现，并配合叙事性总结。